Testing real-time forecasting systems - page 32

 

the fifth day of testing the weekly forecast:


 
neoclassic >> :
Colleagues, does your forecasting quality depend on scale (timeframe) ?

Yes, I wrote a little about it in the fisophone aspect

 

Gentlemen, I look at our screenshots and...open.

Sergei's weekly forecast has the tail up, Oleg's extrapolator also looks up and I have a general move up, I emphasize, general


but, I also have room to move to the "strong" 4250 and the less strong 4220 and Vladimir's forecast shows just at 4220 (+-)

Anyway, my point is that the group opinion.... is strong!

(I finished my thought in a weird way...I wanted to write something clever and that clever thing ran away ^_^)

 

GRNN's past prediction:

New:


 
gpwr >> :


Right on target! >> Congratulations.

 

The final result of testing the forecast within 5 days.


Taki is back :o)

 
grasn >> :

The final result of testing the prediction within 5 days.


It's back :o)

and you said, "why?"

we need to make this model in mql, we definitely do.

 
NEKSUS_ >> :

And you said, "why?"

>> we should do this model in mql, we should do it in mql.

I will translate it in the long run. first we need to increase the "resolution", I think we can do that with probabilistic networks.

 
it's going to be great ^_^
 
grasn >> :

>> yes, I wrote a little bit about it in the phisophian aspect.

Write a little more, please.

Namely, what kind of addiction did you find?

p.s. At the same time a question to all present - have you observed a correlation between timeframe increase and percentage of correct predictions. It would be very interesting to know.