Buy a stable earning advisor - page 2

 
prostojparen >> :

You'd think that everyone here at Forexe writes and uses EAs for purely spiritual enrichment.

Not spiritual, but virtual. Do you know how many virtual multibillionaires hang out in this forum? You too can become one of them if you insist on stable profits.

 
sllawa3 >> :

Anyone can do it, then, with optimisation (at 10% a month)...

So offer it specifically. with stateman from the real account.

 
sllawa3 >>: so, any of them can do it in case of optimization (for 10 % per month)...

Well, well. How much do you think, Slava, how much would such a mere trifle, which brings at least the mentioned 100% a year - but with max. drawdown not more than 5%?

 
Mathemat >> :

Well, well. What do you think, Slava, how much do you think such a mere trifle, which brings at least the mentioned 100% a year - but with a max dropdown of no more than 5%, would cost?

I believe that such cases are not uncommon in any trader... And I suppose if you limit EA's lot size to certain limits (a decent one) then you'll have a stable 100% profit EA per year... (even more than 100)

 

here are the results for example of mcd sample trading (a widespread expert)


Bars in history 3852
238876 ticks simulated
Simulation quality 92%
Chart mismatch errors 1
Initial deposit 1000.00
Net profit 273.98
Total profit 273.98
Total loss 0.00
Profitability
Win expectation 8.56
Absolute drawdown 60.00
Maximum drawdown 103.02 (9.44%)
Relative drawdown 9.44% (103.02)
Total trades 32
Short positions (% win) 9 (100.00%)
Long positions (% win) 23 (100.00%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 32 (100.00%)
Losing trades (% of all) 0 (0.00%)
Largest
profitable trade 12.00
losing trade 0.00
Average
profitable trade 8.56
losing trade 0.00
Maximum
continuous wins (profit) 32 (273.98)
continuous losses (loss) 0 (0.00)
Maximum
continuous gains (number of wins) 273.98 (32)
continuous losses (number of losses) 0.00 (0)
Average
continuous wins 32

continuous loss 0


( it is from the beginning of the month )
 
sllawa3 >> :

here are the results for example of mcd sample trading (a widespread expert)


>> bars in history 3852
Modeled ticks 238876
Simulation quality 92%
Error of chart mismatch 1
Initial deposit 1000.00
Net profit 273.98
Total profit 273.98
Total loss 0.00
Profitability
Expected payoff 8.56
Absolute drawdown 60.00
Maximum drawdown 103.02 (9.44%)
Relative drawdown 9.44% (103.02)
Total trades 32
Short positions (% win) 9 (100.00%)
Long positions (% win) 23 (100.00%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 32 (100.00%)
Loss trades (% of all) 0 (0.00%)
Most profitable trades
profitable trade 12.00
Deal Deal loser 0.00
Average
profitable trade 8.56
Deal loss 0.00
Maximum number
Continuous wins (Profit) 32 (273.98)
Continuous losses (loss) 0 (0.00)
Maximum
Continuous Profit (number of wins) 273.98 (32)
Continuous loss (number of losses) 0.00 (0)
Average
Continuous winnings 32

continuous loss 0


( this is from the beginning of the month )

Gentlemen,

I'm a simple guy, but I'm not stupid.

I told you not to clown around.

 
sllawa3 >> :

When you've traded on REAL account have you never withdraw 100% per day? I think such cases are not uncommon in any trader... I guess if you limit a lot of any EA to certain limits (a decent one) then you'll get a stable 100% withdrawal a year... (even more than 100)

And all those hedge and investment funds are trying their damnedest to squeeze out 20-30% per annum.

It's not always possible. It seems that some degenerates sit there and they don't know the recipe.

of such a simple advisor.

Mathemat didn't write about one-off (read random) withdrawal of 100%, but about stable 8% / month with a strictly limited drawdown.

You have to admit, it's not the same thing.

 
Reshetov >> :

Not spiritual, but virtual. Do you know how many virtual multi-billionaires hang out in this forum? You too can become one of them if you insist on stable profit.

It is a pleasure to hear your opinion as a high-class specialist. As far as I understand, if you are sincere in this case, there is no such thing as an advisor offering a 100% return on investment?

And all this fuss with Expert Advisors, optimizations, various strategies and neural networks, championships, etc. It is nothing else but virtual games, and for real earnings on Forex (I mean traders) it makes absolutely no sense. And who does not understand that (like me) he makes a fool of himself and a clown.

>> Did I get your point right?

 
You're the one with the parameters... so why buy one when you can find one for free?
Files:
 
prostojparen >> :

It is a pleasure to hear your opinion as a high-class specialist. As far as I understand, if you are sincere in this case, there is no such thing as an advisor offering a 100% return on investment?

And all this fuss with Expert Advisors, optimizations, various strategies and neural networks, championships, etc. It is nothing else but virtual games, and for real earnings on Forex (I mean traders) it makes absolutely no sense. And who does not understand that (like me) he makes a fool of himself and a clown.

Did I get your point right?

You have misunderstood the comrade's idea... It's just that quotes change and so does the market... the ones you had a quarter ago are like heaven and earth different from the ones you have now

i.e. the market is unstable... that's why some people are optimising their EA regularly... some people are writing new ones... but i think it's impossible to create a constantly working EA with any quotes and market changes... ( correct my mistake... EA for mt 4 )