Market etiquette or good manners in a minefield - page 59
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I did not include model identification, i.e. the optimal definition of sample length and model order. With them, I think you can get up to 90%. I have no doubt at all that your results will be just as good, or even better. ;)
The trouble is, I'm sorry, it doesn't give a fuck about the profits. Well, it does, but it eats away at it. :)
Точнее даёт, но тут же само и сжирает. :)
HideYourRichess, and you're going to waste a lot of time on Sergei?
Please have a look at it:
Here's the code:
What am I doing wrong?
I don't see any errors at a glance.
This means that your grid is going haywire. I have a learning rate factor of 0.05, a randomisation range of 0.1 and K=1. Put these values and show the result.
Set it up:
Well, there you go. You see!
I had a learning rate of 18 -:)
The fact that K=1 is just for example?
You're giving your girlfriend a hard time! You're driving me crazy.
The "K" thing, yeah. But, actually... it's a delicate subject!
You'll have to gather your forces and get an estimate for the optimal length of the training vector yourself. And so, only experimentally should be chosen.
The problem is that, I'm sorry to say, it doesn't give a fuck about the profits. Well, it does, but it eats you up. :)
It's obvious and understandable, trading levels are set close to the current price, I wrote about it. But I wouldn't say "no way" unambiguously. I have to look at movement statistics (no time to do it now, but it requires some careful approach). One may recall winwin2007, I remember he was trading 1-2 points including spread. He earned about 20 or so points before they adjusted his filter. My made-up approach seems to be stable to "filtering", but who knows, one has to look. Maybe it's not so bad for "total loss" on 1-3 pips deals. And maybe the statistics will show steady profits only at 100% guessing,
PS: How do I explain that it was just an idea based on an equally simple awareness of the fact that a strategy can be based on "directional guessing". It was "new" to me in a way. But this "colour guessing" approach will always have a "dark side" to any strategy, without exception, for the simple reason of extremely limited information. ..., I guess I was being a bit flippant, but whatever.
to Neutron
HideYourRichess, and you want to go over nothing for Sergei?
Did it hurt your ego?
PS: Oh, Seryoga, you can not be such a bastard.