Casino gambler - page 6
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Mine too. The greatest man. Of his own and of many times to come.
+10
Forex is the most profitable of all the legal types of income.
To Antoha: The broker is Russian, everybody knows him, it starts with the letter A. Note, it is not accepted to discuss brokers here.
I wasn't planning on discussing brokers. I think I can guess the name of the broker. It's a great broker. - Is that okay?
By the way i see you're very sensitive to forex being compared to roulette. why?
because it sows the wrong seeds in the unsteady minds.
a lot of people think they've hit a dead end with the analysis and there's no further development
>> actually they're playing in a sandbox.
So go for the markets instead of the casinos.
I've been in the casino business for nine days in my life and you're all over me.
By the way, I know that the mention of gambling hurts a lot of people, I was curious to see how people reacted, so I purposely provoked you - don't be offended, I won't do it again.
Hooray, found how to glue pictures. Xpert, here you go.
1. Don't build anything up, just bet and that's it - 500 spins.
2. We'll build up to x10, 500 spins.
3. We'll build up to a sample of 15,000 spins.
(Vertical of course our balance in units of euros, horizontal number of spins)
forex is included in the list of financial instruments for profit taking at commercial banks
I work in a commercial bank and as far as I know, forex as you are present on it is not a profit making tool for the bank. Normal banks in forex execute clients' orders to buy/sell currency at an agreed rate and with an agreed spread. Banks whose employees are trying to make more money end up doing the same thing as most people here.
I work in a commercial bank and as far as I know forex as you present it is not a tool for a bank to make profit. Normal banks in forex execute client orders to buy/sell currency at an agreed rate and with an agreed spread. The banks whose employees are trying to make more money end up like most of the people here.
Thank you. I was a bit ticked off, not a lot of like-minded people. I just didn't want to start talking about what anyone on the forum might even know about what banks do there. I knew I'd be giving a reason to complain.
strategy: betting on two rows of euros (12 cells): win 1 euro (two of their own save), if lose 2 euros. probability of winning 24/37 = 0.6486, losing 12/37 = 0.3243. (36 cells plus zero). Thus, the idea follows - the strategy will wiggle in zero, but if you add, you can bail out, see what it turns out:
So I formally confirmed on a piece of paper that there is no solution.
Technically you've proved that your strategy doesn't work, but that's not proof that a winning one doesn't exist in principle :-)
>> thank you. I got a little bit pecked.
I couldn't help but support someone who's had the same bumps.
This is part of my code on Fox from five years ago. A pseudo-random generator
sequence with a given probability.
FOR m.i=1 TO m.var2*m.count
INSERT INTO kazino (random) ;
VALUES (RAND())
ENDFOR
GO TOP
DO WHILE NOT EOF()
REPL NEXT m.var1+1 chet WITH 1
REPL NEXT m.var2-m.var1+1 chet WITH 0
ENDDO
INDE ON random TO kazino.idx
GO TOP
REPL ALL randomm WITH RAND()
INDE ON randomm TO kazino.idx
GO TOP
REPL ALL randommm WITH RAND()
INDE ON randommm TO kazino.idx
GO TOP
REPL ALL randommm WITH RAND()
INDE ON randommm TO kazino.idx
Technically you proved that your strategy doesn't work, but it's not the proof that winning strategy doesn't exist in principle :-)
It's not that it's MY STRATEGY - that's a bit of a mouthful. I certainly could give all sorts of calculations, etc., but I will not burden the forum, and so this topic is not particularly pleasant to anyone. But the bottom line is this: given the limits of the bet at a given ratio of profit and loss (in a particular casino, and the casino selected with the best conditions) - it is impossible in principle.
It's like you are offered to bet on red and black but you win by euros and lose by two and you can build up a position to 100 euros, for example - because there is no doubt that there is no profitable strategy.
Here I have also obviously proved that there is no such thing in the case you describe.
I couldn't help but support someone who's had the same bumps.
This is part of my code on Fox from five years ago. A pseudo-random generator
sequence with a given probability.
FOR m.i=1 TO m.var2*m.count
INSERT INTO kazino (random) ;
VALUES (RAND())
ENDFOR
GO TOP
DO WHILE NOT EOF()
REPL NEXT m.var1+1 chet WITH 1
REPL NEXT m.var2-m.var1+1 chet WITH 0
ENDDO
INDE ON random TO kazino.idx
GO TOP
REPL ALL randomm WITH RAND()
INDE ON randomm TO kazino.idx
GO TOP
REPL ALL randommm WITH RAND()
INDE ON randommm TO kazino.idx
GO TOP
REPL ALL randommm WITH RAND()
INDE ON randommm TO kazino.idx
but I didn't generate my sequence - it's authentic :)