You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Zhunko, are you really Buffett or something?
Zhunko, are you really Buffet or something?
:-)) Is everything measured in money?
I have everything when I need it. >> why more? >> I don't understand.
When you already have enough money to fulfill all your desires - surely happiness is not in them, but in something else. I myself believe that true happiness is not about material things.
OK, Vadim, let's not get esoteric - although this thread has long since become something of a natural intelligence thread. Actually, I was just joking - but, apparently, unsuccessfully.
Dedicated to the koryefeys and beginners
:-)) Is everything valued in money?
I have everything when I need it. Why more? I don't understand.
Liar, however. One cannot have everything in principle. Another thing is that everyone puts reasonable limits on themselves, but these also change depending on the situation.
You're lying, though. One cannot have everything in principle. Another thing is that everybody sets reasonable limits for himself, but they also change depending on the situation.
Man says - this is mine.
God says - this is Me.
Why grab when it is Me?
Take as much as you need. Why take more?
============
In your own home, how do you behave? Not destroying the place for the sake of pocketing the most valuable things, are you?
>> Act the same way everywhere.
It may be possible to try to read the indexes of major currencies. Then synthesize the pair. Use the divergence of a real pair and a synthetic one for trading.
But this divergence can only be seen on M1.
You could try counting the major currency indices. Then synthesise a pair. Trade on the divergence of the real pair and synthetic one.
But this divergence can only be seen on M1.
In the absence of a methodology that gives predictable results, any theoretical idea is promising (until practice proves otherwise). We have to try it. The question is: Who can implement it in real time on the monitor? A question for everyone present. Thank you.
In the absence of a methodology that gives predictable results, any theoretical idea is promising (until practice proves otherwise). We have to try it. The question is: Who can implement it in real time on the monitor? A question for everyone present. >> Thank you.
I have it implemented. >> I don't recommend this way.
I have implemented it. I do not advise this way.
1. "This path" is the path of a pair synthesised by indices?
2. If the practice has proved futile, it is necessary to determine why. This will give food for further reflection. So, what was the unfeasibility of the idea?
>> Thank you.