[WARNING CLOSED!] Any newbie question, so as not to clutter up the forum. Professionals, don't go by. Can't go anywhere without you. - page 10
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
UUHH finally free.....
Hello granit77. In previous posts you and I have been working out the condition of the trading function for CCI. Here's what I got.....
Did I do everything right? Or again, out of inexperience, got it wrong.......
In this place double cci_1............. cci must be written with a small letter????????
Did I do it right?
I think so...
In this place double cci_1............. cci must be written with a small letter????????
No, you can call it anything you like.
It's just that there are some generally accepted conventions about naming and generally code styles.
One of them is that local variable names are spelled with a small letter.
I think so...
No, you can call them whatever you want.
It's just that there are some generally accepted conventions about naming and generally code styles.
One of them is to spell local variable names with a small letter.
OK I get it......
I set SELLSTOP (with stop loss and Take Profit), after it triggered I put BUYSTOP at same level with loss triggered (i.e. stop reversal).
The problem is I have to sit and wait for SELLSTOP to close, if I reach profit I cancel second order. How can I mechanise this?
If the first order BUYSTOP the same but inversely .
Thank you.
It is very interesting to know which, if not a secret, methods a pro uses to filter out the trend from the channel impulse movement (i.e. the trend is not necessary in hell, we filter it out if it is present (in the EA), and if it is not present, then it is very important, that is, the EA does not work when there is a trend)
The Damiani_Volt indicator can be used.
Hello.
At the beginning of this page, I posted my piece of code (edited with the help of granit77, thanks to him). It was checked by TheXpert, thanks to him too.
BUT.... THE QUESTION is, in the trading condition is it not necessary to specify (for CCI) -100???????????? It says +100, but the indicator itself has a value of -100 and -150
and even reaches -180??????
Now the following.... If we consider the logic of writing a trading condition for CCI, then I have the following for RSI and WPR....
Why did you take 100 for the rsi level ?
Why did you take 100 for the rsi level ?
In the post above, I have corrected myself. Levels 30 70, for WPR 20 and 80