How to form the input values for the NS correctly. - page 26

 
Reshetov писал (а) >>

Where else is there to banter but in a forum?

It's all right to banter, but do it in a way that's fun for everyone, or better yet, banter about yourself. :)

At your "nerd" past and remember that when you heard about neural networks for the first time, not now shoving others behind the belt and bending your fingers. There are some common decency even on forums.

Thank you for your understanding.

 
TheXpert писал (а) >>

It's not all that fast. Is yours there?

It's only for you, the nerd, that it's all so simple, like "take an approximation and spit on any non-stationarity from a high bell, and don't forget to buy a shovel to make a lot of money".


And for us - traders everything is much more prosaic: non-stationarity in financial markets generates non-stationarity of income, and therefore not only in Forbes, but also on the pages of local tabloids you will never get.

 
sergeev писал (а) >>

It's okay to make fun of people, but it's better to make fun of yourself. :)

At your own "nerd" past and remember that once you heard about neural networks for the first time, not now shoving others behind the belt and bending your fingers. After all, there is a measure of decency even on forums.

Thank you for your understanding.

Well, I'm not saying I've never been a teapot, but as soon as I was born I had the coolest neural net inputs bolted on right away.

 
Yeah, Yura, you weren't born with a shirt on, you were born with a nerve!
 
Mathemat писал (а) >>
Yeah, Yura, not born in the shirt, but in the nerve!

in a matrix... :-)

 
Reshetov писал (а) >>

Well, I'm not saying that I've never been a dummy, but as soon as I was born I put some awesome inputs on the neural net.

:) Can we go back to the original ... How to properly generate training samples? ;)

 
Reshetov писал (а) >>

You're the one who doesn't quite understand that on a training (or as it's also called: "representative") sample, it's a barefaced fit. Normal traders prefer to see on OOS (out of sample), i.e. outside the representative sample (forward tests). No broker will pay for approximation accuracy.

Whether you like it or not, the NS on the training sample deals exactly with approximation. And the extrapolation properties of the resulting approximation is a separate issue. And the representativeness of the training sample (don't confuse the two) and OOS testing is a separate issue.

 
rip писал (а) >>

:) Maybe we should go back to the original post... how to properly generate training samples? ;)

If I were a prospector, I could tell a dummy how to find gold. But that does not mean that I would share the metal I have mined.


Likewise with the entrances. I have already reported enough on how to locate adequate entrances. But I will not publish the entrances I managed to find for obvious reasons.


Therefore, there are a few variants:


1. To read carefully my post and start searching for the inputs.

2. to make fun of this post in order to show my coolness.

3. Continue asking questions here in the hope that someone will give you the information for free on a silver platter


Well, I don't have a lot of time to be fucking around in here.


Goodbye, then. I'll look in on you when I get a chance.

 
OK. We'll look forward to it.
 

There's a trick!

Calling someone a name - sassing them

Tell them they're a jerk

Some people use it to prove themselves. It's just their way of doing things.

They think they are getting higher - well, the principle of the hen house - whoever sat higher craps on those who could not get higher

they are psychologically built that way - they realize their "toughness" and present it that way

It's inherent in immature, self-confident men-- boys

---

sitting at home in a comfortable armchair or chair, maybe a sofa or something else, it is easy enough to be rude.