Bring the MARTINGALE to its senses. - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Yeah, not only can he do bad things himself... ...but also with his hands)))
When used wisely, martigail is very effective.
Especially if you don't place pending orders at the outset. Instead, it is better to open additional oversized positions
not just based on specified levels, but based on the current reasoning.
Using separate algorithms for additional positions on (for example) Force indicators, APR, etc.
In addition, apparently not every tool is "equally good" for martingale.
Better suit (according to my experiments) inert, "hard" pairs.
Here's an example, a test on such a five-step "quasi-martin", m5, Kiwi, from April 1 up to today.
Lots are not doubling, they are only slightly increasing with every step.
First lot =0.05, then 0.1-0.15-0.2-0.25.
As you can see, during this time, we did not get to the last, fifth step. It means it is important to select entry conditions not only for the initial position, but also for additional positions! But also additional positions!
The Expert Advisor "works" well on a real account in 2 brokerage companies
Is this the resource owner's new policy? I like it in principle, although I'm a fan of editing myself.
2 rid: can't you post the same report with an initial deposit of 1000? The drawdown (relative) will be increased by 50 times.
I have one with 1000.
Using a martigail is very effective with a sensible approach.
Especially if you don't place pending orders at the outset. Instead, it is better to open additional oversized positions
not just based on specified levels, but based on the current reasoning.
Using separate algorithms for additional positions on (for example) Force indicators, APR, etc.
In addition, apparently not every tool is "equally good" for martingale.
Better suit (according to my experiments) inert, "hard" pairs.
Here's an example, a test on such a five-step "quasi-martin", m5, Kiwi, from April 1 up to today.
Lots are not doubling, they are only slightly increasing with every step.
First lot =0.05, then 0.1-0.15-0.2-0.25.
As you can see, during this time, we did not get to the last, fifth step. It means it is important to select entry conditions not only for the initial position, but also for additional positions! But also additional positions!
The Expert Advisor works pretty good on real trade in 2 brokerage companies
It may go up to the fifth step if we trend martingale.
Yeah, not only can he do bad things himself... he can also do it with his hands )))
>> don't be afraid :)
he will reach the fifth step if he is trending martingale. so levels have to be put into him
Yes there are levels. But levels are only one of the conditions (not the most important one) to open each next step.
Yes, there are levels. But levels are only one of the conditions (not the most important one) for the opening of each next step.
you know, it's the only way to cure a losing position in a short amount of time.
>> what's not the main thing?
The old army joke comes to mind: "What is the main thing in a tank? ">> etc.
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
A simple Expert Advisor with a lightweight martingale can be downloaded here :
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/104481
If you want to trade on the mt4 broco on Dax or Footsie, m1, try to test the Expert Advisor online. There you can check effect of any (well, almost) tactic in conditions close to real one in two or three hours at timef=m1.
Good luck !