You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
He did. Proof?
I gave mine.
to alsu "And what here contradicts my statements?"
That clever man, BQQ, who posted there quite a few original filters, wrote you there: "SMA(N+1) lags by N/2 samples" and "I tell the truth. Check it with your fingers or call the grpdelay function in MATLAB, if you feel more comfortable with it". - I join in. You could not give any proof, because there is none. You have cited your nonsense, nothing more.
to alsu "And what here contradicts my statements?"
That clever man, BQQ, who posted there quite a few original filters, wrote you there: "SMA(N+1) lags by N/2 samples" and "I tell the truth. Check it with your fingers or call the grpdelay function in MATLAB, if you feel more comfortable with it". - I join.
I'm tired of listening to your nonsense. Build a "sine wave" with a period of 2 bars. Look at that broken line, be glad you know it's a sine wave, and apply the SMA(20) to it. It will be a straight line, one would assume.
"blah blah blah. No argument, no education."
Dummy, how about I build you two graphs with VERY DIFFERENT input frequencies, and show you that the lag is the same on your fingers (picture)? Will you calm down?
with your hands on paper? Go ahead.
I'll stop by in the morning and have a look.
here, model 1, and SMA(100) and model 2, and SMA(100).
The frequencies differ by a factor of 2.5. I think that's enough. Showed 500 bars of model sine waves. You, as an expert in determining lag "by eye" should see that it is the same. Look at the interval between 100 and 200 bars on the abscissa axis. And I will even tell you what it is equal to. 49.5 bars.