Not looking for investors or trying to sell an expert :) just interested in opinions - page 11
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac626/ac626009be7d812de23e68d92143c79397d02ed6" alt="MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal"
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I look at any large enough drawdown as a real moose. That's my point of view, I'm not imposing it on anyone. But it very quickly removes the rose-coloured glasses through which a "strategy" like "ftop" looks great.
1) please state in numbers or ranges which drawdowns you think are good, bad, ideal, terrible, etc.
2. Read smart books on how to test properly - e.g. Pardo, http://ihtik.lib.ru/economy_21dec2006/economy_21dec2006_495.rar. In the form in which the test results are often posted here, you can definitely only draw negative conclusions about the strategy and no positive ones.
3. this is where I have a hard time. Well, a more or less correct one is, for example, Better's(see Championship-2007). He may even have a not so steep curve of equity growth. But pay attention to his drawdowns. Even though he is not on his best streak, he still behaves decently with the same amount of open trades and is slowly climbing upwards.
Symbol
EURUSD (Euro vs US Dollar)
Period
4 Hour (H4) 1999.01.26 20:00 - 2006.12.29 20:00 (1999.01.01 - 2007.01.01)
Model
All ticks (most accurate method based on all smallest available timeframes)
Bars in history
12890
Modelled ticks
14348086
Modeling quality
89.30%
Initial deposit
5000.00
Net profit
161559.00
Total profit
161559.00
Total loss
0.00
Profitability
Expected payoff
7343.59
Absolute drawdown
2247.20
Maximum drawdown
43276.20 (32.94%)
Relative drawdown
74.47% (8920.00)
Total transactions
22
Short positions (% of winners)
0 (0.00%)
Long positions (% win)
22 (100.00%)
Profitable trades (% of all)
22 (100.00%)
Loss trades (% of all)
0 (0.00%)
Largest
profitable trade
12000.00
losing deal
0.00
Average
profitable deal
7343.59
losing trade
0.00
Maximum number
continuous wins (profit)
22 (161559.00)
Continuous losses (loss)
0 (0.00)
Maximum
Continuous profits (number of wins)
161559.00 (22)
Continuous loss (number of losses)
0.00 (0)
Average
continuous winnings
22
Continuous loss
0
Set a "normal" StopLoss - and instead of "sitting through" drawdowns, you will have loss-making trades. And then think what to do with it.
Set a "normal" StopLoss - and instead of "sitting through" drawdowns you'll have loss-making trades. And then think what to do about it.
That is, create a problem for yourself and then heroically solve it :)
Corvin, if you think that large drawdowns are not a problem for you, then go ahead and trade. You asked the question for a reason, but to ask for advice?
P.S. Heroism is just sitting it out, not accepting losses.
I mean, create a problem myself and then heroically solve it :)
And 22 deals is nothing for statistics. It's an adjustment and self-deception. And you have to test it with a constant lot. It is only later on the real (if it comes to it) that you can switch on the MM.