How can I tell if an advisor is being knocked out by the DC? - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It is too early to close the thread, because it is obvious that many people do not understand the situation so far, and they think that the prohibition of automatic trading broker - is a myth.
Well, maybe sooner or later many people will face it themselves... It's just strange that developers are trying to hush up the topic instead of explaining to people in detail what and how.
The question here is not whether the broker may or may not prohibit autotrading, he may, there is no denying that. If you understand the reasons why it is done - you have to conclude about further cooperation with this brokerage company (one thing is a "shoddy" EA, overloading the server, malicious pipser, gridder placing hundreds of illegal trades (no one will tolerate it, no matter what they promised you initially), another is an unwillingness of the broker to let you earn).
In this case, the only argument, on the demo trades - on the real no, which is not proof of banning the EA. To all the advice, requests to see the logs, statements, the author of the thread is deaf and dumb and sure of the infallibility of himself and his EA, keeps repeating "the demo is working, the real is not ". They have saidit 20 times "it does not mean anything, may be different trade conditions, different quotes".
As for the brokers, they do not have an official position when the traders are trading on the real market. If I were a moderator, I would have closed or deleted this thread a long time ago. How long can you keep rubbing words about nothing, making unsubstantiated assertions and hurting other forum participants?
They have a very good idea of how to fix the problem and how to fix it in the right way, but I don't know how to fix it.
The orderSend() functions need an initial delay, which is acceptable to brokerage companies so that there are not too many requests, but if you view RUSSIAN FOREX as a casino, I mean, if you can make money, you will not be let in at the door, so what is there to do.
Abyrwalgh.
How to close a branch it is interesting to all as this issue is resolved and for functions like OrderSend() need an initial delay, which suits DCs so that there are not frequent requests, but if you consider the Russian Forex as a casino in the sense that if you can make money, you are not allowed on the doorstep so what actually do here.
Abyrwalgh.
Bulgakov has been read by many, including Dog's Heart. But the idea is interesting in that we start looking at the end rather than the beginning. What would turn out to be 'GlavRish'. That's a very interesting point. I completely agree.
Deciphered for the uninitiated. Although SK may have had something else in mind. I understood it that way.
Bulgakov has been read by many, including "A Dog's Heart", but the idea is interesting in that we start looking at the end rather than the beginning. Which would make it "GlavrFish". That's a very interesting point. I completely agree.
Deciphered for the uninitiated. Although SK may have had something else in mind. I understood it that way.
It's basically correct. But you didn't win, you lost, and not in forex, but in cards. Although, on the whole, correct. Correct in the sense that on the wrong end, on the wrong side.
I see a different problem - our low level of development. The inability to behave, the inability to express thoughts, the darker shades of thoughts themselves, arrogance and servility, bitterness, scolding, suspicion of the worst and this pervasive desire to consume at all costs. That's how we are.
Abyrwalg is an association. Might as well say HolderShonders or HoldrenSholder... or just pink pants. Out of desperation or something.
You just want a little purity.
Many people have read Bulgakov, including "Heart of a Dog", but the idea is interesting, in that we start looking at the end, not the beginning. Which would make it "GlavrFish". That's a very interesting point. I totally agree.
Deciphered for the uninitiated. Although SK may have had something else in mind. I understood it that way.
Pretty much right. But you didn't win, you lost, and not in forex, but in cards. Although, on the whole, correct. Correct in the sense that on the wrong end, on the wrong side.
I see a different problem - our low level of development. The inability to behave, the inability to express thoughts, the darker shades of thoughts themselves, arrogance and servility, bitterness, scolding, suspicion of the worst and this pervasive desire to consume at all costs. That's how we are.
Abyrwalg is an association. Might as well say HolderShonders or HoldrenSholder... or just pink pants. Out of desperation or something.
I just want a little purity.
Everyone wants to, but not everyone gets to. Maybe we should put the question another way. What do you want? Almost a poster of the Civil and Patriotic War. We are who we are. And we are what we want to be. Just so long as what was and what will be are different. Now let's go back a little bit.
I agree, you can't solve problems I DC when they arise, you have to solve them before they arise. I am talking to the author of this thread. But he is here and he has asked a very precise question. And MQL tools allow to solve them.
But the fact that we are solving problems at the end, yes, we do. This is a human psychology. But it's no use scolding a man for that. He is the way he is.
Although I wish it were the other way round, but it means that I have to be different too. But everything in this world changes. And so are we, although we may not even notice it.
The orderSend() needs an initial delay, which satisfies brokerage companies so that they do not make requests often, but if you view the Russian Forex as a casino, it means that if you can make money, you will not be let in the door.
Danvo wanted to tell you, but could not dare. My first interest to Forex was a forex trading simulator. Of course I opened an order and the price goes the other way. I think they made it on purpose. But still... I have written my own simulator based on random numbers - charts are quite similar to forex. I started to train.... And just imagine - the effect is the same - I open an order and the price goes the other way. But I did not cheat myself in this programme. It is hard to believe that everything is in itself.
And those who can make money, make it on the Russian forex.
Now I added a delay of 3 seconds after each order sending, so far it works. The Expert Advisor was jammed, I am 100% sure of it. Although, the technical support wrote that they do not disable the Expert Advisor even in case of frequent requests.
I don't know what you meant to say about me, but I remembered my first company from the early 90s, Zay Fish.
Nothing about you, just saying. What do you mean, "Zay Fish"?