You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Who is the MM according to your model? Can you give me an example?
I don't know - I can't.
But the MM availability model answers my question of why the price falls when everyone is buying. And that's good enough for me so far!
I argue that MM drives the price where it is profitable. MM, by agreement with other MMs, with governments of countries, can temporarily take a loss, i.e. move the price against itself, but will surely win it back later, to his advantage.
I don't know - I can't.
But the MM availability model answers my question of why the price falls when everyone is buying. And that's good enough for me so far!
What we are actually discussing here is the reasons for the price movement. I am arguing that the price is driven by MM to where it benefits. MM, by agreement with other MMs, with national governments, may temporarily take a loss, i.e. move the price against itself, but will surely win it back later, to his advantage.
how will he win back his hand? Look at this: every tick with MM contracts for bid and ask. So the peeple sells or buys. The difference between buying and selling changes his aggregate position. MM cannot force people to buy or sell, so when he needs to close his position to profit (for example, short) and according to you he will move quotes in the right direction (down), where is the guarantee that other market participants will sell more than buy? Because only then, if they predominantly sell, will his short pose shrink. They may well continue to buy, increasing MM's cumulative shorting. Especially given that not all participants are speculators and will necessarily cover their losses (and it may not be losses at all, but securing activity in other markets). This scheme can theoretically work if MM has more money available than all other participants combined.
That's why it is desirable for MM to balance near zero cumulative position or to manipulate in relatively small ranges. But sooner or later, he has to follow the general demand rather than against it. And most likely very early on))
Buying and selling on the forex market is done through voluntary bids. Are you saying that some market participant is obliged to make a trade on an order that he did not submit?
The price in the market is driven by the agreement of all market participants. In this sense, the market is in equilibrium at all times.
And all disagreements are in the spread, where the broker's commission is also "hidden", as is customary in forex.
Yes! I have had no problem with either buying or selling. Someone regularly sells to me and buys back from me. Kitchen, DC, Broker, Bank, MM... what do I care who does it?
The price on the market is driven by the agreement of all market participants. In this sense, the market is in equilibrium at any given time.
And all the disagreements are in the spread, and the broker's commission is "hidden" there as well, as it is customary in Forex.
Yep, except that I always disagree with all market participants - no matter how many orders are placed, market participants almost always push the price against me, I hope I'm the only one among the notorious 95% who lose ;) (my bad habits :) )
Yep, except that I always disagree with all market participants - no matter how you place orders the market participants are almost always pushing the price against me, I hope I'm the only one who lost ;) (ugh, ugh, ugh, I'm starting to talk to myself :) )
How can you not move the price, as the quote taker has plenty of options for organising a flush. The money is there - you just have to take it... Moreover, we work with one or two pairs:
EURCADconst = EURUSD ↑ * USDCAD ↓
EURCADconst = EURUSD ↓ * USDCAD ↑
EURCADconst = EURUSD const * USDCAD const
EURCAD↓ = EURUSD ↓ * USDCAD ↓
EURCAD↓ = EURUSD const * USDCAD ↓
EURCAD↓ = EURUSD ↓ * USDCAD const
EURCAD↑ = EURUSD ↑ * USDCAD ↑
EURCAD↑ = EURUSD const * USDCAD ↑
EURCAD↑ = EURUSD ↑ * USDCAD const
↑ - rate goes up
↓ - rate decreases.
And so on. A lot of variations are added if you start using double or even triple up or down
↑ - exchange rate rises (get - left to open SELL)
↓ - exchange rate goes down (get it - open BUY on the left)
The problem is not defined correctly, don't try to fool yourself, just call things by their proper names:
↑ - exchange rate was going up (get it - open SELL on the left)
↓ - exchange rate was falling (receipt - you had to open BUY on the left)
HH: at the tick level you can still make a decision to enter the market in the right direction based on the nearest history (last ticks), but the profit will only be equal to the spread, or even half of the spread