How much does it cost to write a "complex" EA? - page 29

 
timbo:
NYROBA:

And what prevents you from opening 100 dung accounts and making, as you put it, one pearl?

Why do I need a virtual pearl?
By the way, when you tricked the Composter and he offered you a wager that he would repeat your result in the same dung-covered way, you somehow got cold feet, backed out and chewed up the wager. What's all the fuss about now?


You're just ahead of me in the post above, I also remembered our friend Composter. :)))

I never turn down an argument, I've accepted the Composter's wager.

I just have a few taboos:

1) not to gamble in casinos

2) Don't play the machines and

3) Never bet for money, even if I know the outcome 100%!

Not once in my life have I broken any of these rules, i.e. never bet even

even if the amount was symbolic, and I'm not going to break them :)

Regards.

Alex Niroba

 
timbo:
NYROBA:

This account was opened in a dispute with qee, he made a bet that I could not increase my deposit by 230% in the frozen account.

Within 2 weeks I increased my deposit by 800% in the frozen account.

And then greed did its work - I overloaded positions and lost my deposit.

Where does the deposit increase? There are three penny trades on the plus side and the rest are consistently in the red.

There were 800% plus, to be exact, it was +780%, and then we lost. :)
 
NYROBA:

This account was opened in a bet with qee, he made a bet that I could not increase my deposit by 230% in the frozen account.

Within 2 weeks I increased my deposit by 800% in the frozen account.

And then greed did its work - I overloaded my positions and lost the deposit.


What is important, imho, is not so much the fact that the account increased, but the result: it was wiped out. If you had stopped after an 800% gain and announced that you had won the bet, everything would have been clear. But by continuing to trade in the account, you probably wanted to show that you could work like that for a long time. But no. :) Almost anyone can trade on the profit for a certain period of time. Proof of profitable trading may be at least 3 months, better half a year. Then all the questions are automatically removed. The only thing you have to declare the account publicly before you start working on it.
 
goldtrader:
NYROBA:

This account was opened in a bet with qee, he made a bet that I could not increase my deposit by 230% in the frozen account.

Within 2 weeks I increased my deposit by 800% in the frozen account.

And then greed did its work - I overloaded positions and lost this deposit.


The important thing, imho, is not so much the fact that the account went up, but the bottom line: IT WAS SLIT. If you had stopped after the 800% rise and announced that you had won the bet, everything would have been clear. But, by continuing to trade in the account, you probably wanted to show that you could do that for a sufficiently long period of time. But no. :) Almost anyone can trade on the profit for a certain period of time. Proof of profitable trading may be at least 3 months, better half a year. Then all the questions are automatically removed. The only requirement is to declare the account publicly before you start working on it.


The account was frozen and + 800% was observed by all who were interested.

I did not stop at 230% as was suggested by the disputer, but at a profit of + 800% and declared a wager.

Then when I continued to actively reinvest the account was drained, it's true.

The strategy is profitable, the main thing that I'm sure of it, and on the opinions of others I

I don't really care... Why do I have to prove something to someone?

 
NYROBA писал (а): The strategy is profitable, the main thing is that I'm sure of it, and I'm not interested in other people's opinions.

I don't really care... Why should I prove anything to anyone?

In that case, what is the point of public monitoring?

If you are using the profitable TS, you can work in profit on the real account. Money likes silence, right? And with 100 times of profits from manual trading within a month, you can hire the best programmers who will code the TS in all possible languages.

 
NYROBA:


The account was frozen almost from the opening, I do not remember exactly in one of the parallel threads,

I think there was a discussion about German WinWin's strategy. Ask Mathematician, I think he's been watching the trade

from the very beginning, maybe not, but the fact that the account is locked should confirm it. :)))


The first two days of 13-14.09.2007 my account was definitely not locked. During this time Alex (judging by account history) raised the deposit by about 300%. After that he posted the password to the account.

I monitored this account after 17.09.2007. During this time Alex has made 118 profitable trades and not a single loss. He managed to enter the market with profit only 8 times under supervision, and then he had some negative trades after that. And then he had only losing trades. Consequently, the result.

So my statement that Alex cannot show good results even on the demo if the account is locked, turned out to be almost correct. He did manage to impress me. Namely - the speed at which he cashed 800 000. I think it only took him two days.

 
Yurixx:
NYROBA:


The account has been frozen almost since the opening, I don't remember exactly in one of the parallel threads,

I think it was a discussion of German WinWin's strategy. Ask Mathematician, I think he was watching the trade

I don't know exactly in one of the threads where they discuss German WinWin's strategy, in my opinion Mathematician. :)))


I can confirm that the account was NOT locked from the start. The first two active days 13-14.09.2007 the account was definitely not locked. During this time Alex (judging by account history) raised the deposit by about 300%. After that he posted the password to the account.

I monitored this account after 17.09.2007. In the time prior to that Alex made 118 profitable trades and not a single loss. He has managed to enter the market with profit only 8 times under supervision, and then he had some losing trades. And then he had only losing trades. Consequently, the result.

So my statement that Alex cannot show good results even on the demo if the account is locked, turned out to be almost correct. But he managed to impress me. Namely - the speed at which he cashed 800 000. I think it only took him two days.

Yurix, as always, you hear the bell, but you don't know where it is! :)))

We are discussing the current demo account with 1500% profit in 3 weeks.

Логин: 573561 Пароль инвестора: rbz6jfl(только просмотр)
 
goldtrader:
NYROBA wrote (a): Strategy is profitable, the main thing that I'm sure of it, and the opinions of others to me

I don't really care... Why should I prove anything to anyone?

In that case, what's the point of public monitoring?

I think the main thing is that I'm confident in it and the other people's opinions are very important to me. The money likes silence, right? And with 100x profit from manual trading you can hire the best programmers who will code the TS in all possible languages.


You're right, it's hard to argue here.

As it turns out trading in real life is different from trading on the demo. :)))

 
NYROBA:

I thought the Composter was threatening to raise 2000% in a month and even offered a cash wager. :)))
Composter, how are you doing?

Haven't gotten around to making this "gem" yet - lots of travelling and work.

But I have it on my to-do list and will definitely do it.
I will post the results here.


NYROBA:

I never turn down an argument, I accepted the Composter's bet.

NYROBA:

I've never broken any of these rules in my life, i.e. I haven't even bet
if the amount was symbolic, and I don't intend to break them :)

And how does accepting my bet fit in with the rule about not betting for money?
Or by "concept" of betting, do you mean a verbal argument? ;)
 
komposter:
NYROBA:

like Composter threatened to raise 2000% in a month and even offered a money wager. :)))
Composter, how are you doing?

Haven't gotten around to making this "gem" yet - a lot of travel and work.

But I have it on my to-do list and will definitely do it.
I will post the results here.

You say you haven't got around to it, I see... :))))
NYROBA:

I've never broken any of these rules in my life, i.e. I haven't even bet
if the amount was symbolic, and I don't intend to break them :)

How does accepting my bet fit in with the rule about not betting for money?
Or does the "concept" of betting mean a verbal argument? ;)


I accepted your wager.

I suggested that you and I open one account, not 100 dung accounts as Timbo put it, and in a frozen depot

to trade for, like, a month. Whoever has a bigger deposit wins the bet.

If you're so anxious to part with your $100 if you lose, transfer it to

to the account of any orphanage, and you'll post the payment on this thread.

You will kill two birds with one stone, make sure that I trade on a single account and not 100 accounts at a time,

Have you ever tried to trade hands simultaneously in more than one account? :))))

and second - show me the results of your praised Expert Advisor (extra advertising for you as a programmer).

How is it?