You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Dube proved the impossibility of a systematic win on a random series of data. He's a mathematician. Simply put - there is no system for winning at a constant bet.
Dube proved the impossibility of a systematic win on a random series of data. He's a mathematician. Simply put - there is no system for winning at a constant bet.
Dube proved the impossibility of a systematic win on a random series of data. He's a mathematician. Simply put - there is no system for winning at a constant bet.
Similar studies of the normal distribution have been carried out by Northern Wind. The link is http://forum.fxclub.ru/showthread.php?t=32942. Rosh, you are just a little bit away from the grail: you have to convert real data into normally distributed ones. This is also Northwind's idea...
2 usdjpy: the crowd of people who think Dub is a moron is growing and spreading...
Dube proved the impossibility of a systematic win on a random series of data. He's a mathematician. Simply put - there is no system for winning at a constant bet.
It's natural and normal.
Dube proved the impossibility of a systematic win on a random series of data. He's a mathematician. Simply put - there is no system for winning at a constant bet.
Unfortunately I could not read the article, but I got the impression that Chebotarev and Yashin are just gathering an address database for spam - first too crazy pictures, then
On a limited sample once optimised you can get a profit. Make it infinite and you get a big fich.
On a limited sample, once optimised, you can make a profit. Make it infinite and you get a big fich.
Similar studies of the normal distribution have been carried out by Northern Wind. The link is http://forum.fxclub.ru/showthread.php?t=32942. Rosh, you are just a bit away from the grail: you have to convert real data into normally distributed ones. This is also Northwind's idea...
2 usdjpy: the crowd of people who think Dub is a moron is growing and spreading...
On a limited sample, once optimised, you can make a profit. Make it infinite and you get a big fich.
What does this have to do with it? I'm talking about taking a finite sample, optimising a strategy on it and then using that sample this optimised strategy shows a profit. This is by no means a refutation of Dub's evidence.
Dub cannot have supporters, he is neither a religious figure nor a politician. There can be two categories - those who understand him and those who do NOT understand him.