You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Arbitrage - the purchase or sale of a financial instrument and the simultaneous opening of an opposite position in a related market in order to profit from a small price discrepancy between markets.
Currency arbitrage - a transaction to buy one or more foreign currencies and then sell them in order to profit from differences in exchange rates over time or due to differences in exchange rates in different markets.
No comment.I think the discussion was not so much around the question of whether it is arbitrage or not, but around the question of how a fair price is defined.
After all, it is the difference in price from the fair price that constitutes the source of profit and the opportunity for arbitrage here.
And in the end, despite Reshetov's silence, it was sorted out. So what difference does it make now whether it corresponds to the term or not?
No comment.
I think the discussion was not so much about whether or not it was arbitrage, but rather about how a fair price is determined.
After all, it is the difference in price from fair price that constitutes the source of profit and the opportunity for arbitrage here.
And in the end, despite Reshetov's silence, it was sorted out. So what difference does it make now whether or not it corresponds to the term?
double dt = (money / Ask - com) * experts / (experts + 1);
if the volume (dt) is positive, we buy; if it is negative, we sell (but we substitute Bid instead of Ask price when selling). Correspondingly, if the volume is zero, then it is a fair price
k * (money / rightprice - com) = 0
where: k = experts / (experts + 1)
since k is not equal to 0, because experts are at least 1, everything but k can be equal to zero, i.e. the second part of the product
money / rightprice - com = 0
hence
com = money / rightprice
and consequently, the fair price is
rightprice = money / com
:-)))
This is from Reshetov:
''Note for the especially gifted: all parameters for each EA are set once before it is started and are not changed during autotrading - constants. (The current price at the time of setting an EA is not the current price at any other time. It is the starting price to determine where the quotes went before the first contract for the instrument was opened. "
thanks
and the rest seems to be a mess:
"For the second contract, the starting price will be the opening price of the first contract. For the third the second and so on and so forth).''
Here's a couple of pictures for all of us not particularly gifted ones
explaining what beginPrice is
or another example
For all of us who are not particularly gifted, here are a couple of pictures
explaining what beginPrice is
Thanks for the pictures anyway! Only I'm afraid they will not change anything in the opinions of the parties either...
P.S. Although, I admit, the situation here is far from as unambiguous as with the single-currency one.
For all of us who are not particularly gifted, here are a couple of pictures
explaining what beginPrice is
Thanks for the pictures anyway! Only I'm afraid they won't change anything in the opinions of the parties either...
Good evening!
I most likely belong to the "Lost Comrades". Such pictures have been drawn of me as well. And still don't you think that if we slightly tweak the code to limit the number of orders with a negative sign ( at the moment), before returning to the right point, we can reduce the drawdown. Or update beginPrice from time to time. (In 30 per cent of all Expert Advisors you can adjust to them, and not bad at all). And you gave an example on one chart. What if we look at the linked charts and then calculate the drawdown? Maybe it will be in the red (most probably), but we may survive the drawdown. I like Expert Advisors because they do not require any unnecessary changes, everything is visible right away. This is the simplicity of theory and no tricks (maybe with the exception of a very scientific reasoning).
Or update beginPrice from time to time.
Although I think it makes sense to bind beginprice not to time but to price trend. At the moment I'm searching for the tool most suitable for this purpose. There are a lot of levels, etc.
Tell me more specifically about this EA - how does it differ froma martingale? According to the charts it looks like it does not.
And yet, don't you think that by tweaking the code a bit to limit the number of orders with a negative sign ( at the moment), before returning to the right point, we can reduce the drawdown.
And there's no telling what would be better - to play Forex without the risk of margin call (with a small drawdown) or just to put money in the bank.