You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Gentlemen, to the question of optimisation and fitting and the influence of dealing centres on this.
Here are the results of a run with the same parameters at my place (Teletrader Demo server).
Xeon, thank you. I thought so :)
Gentlemen, to the question of optimisation and fitting and the influence of dealing centres on this.
Here are the results of a run with the same parameters at my place (Teletrader Demo server).
Can we see a more extended report?
dmitry, note that TralingStop=5 here. Of course, with such a close stop the effect of noise will be very high. By the way, my Liteforex does not allow such close stops at all. My stop orders are at least 10 pips away from the market. As for the ticks issue in general, most likely, the ticks will have to be written into a file and the optimizer will be fed with them. Yes, I do not like it very much myself, but the task is to beat a very concrete broker in a very concrete and small time period. I think it is better to optimize by the exact tick chart.
Can we see a more extended report?
I'm going to try again. It didn't work. :?
TralingStop=5
TralingStop optimisation from 5 to 50
eugenk1
TralingStop=5
Optimize TralingStop from 5 to 50
I gave optimization options for TralingStop with parameters from 5 to 50 points in increments of 5
here is a graph with TralingStop = 30 with the same other parameters
And ultimately this is not the point, I just wanted to show that by optimizing for historical data you can achieve quite acceptable results. The other matter is that an EA optimized in such a way (according to unverified assumptions) will work (for example, on a demo account), but not for a long time.
Maybe someone will want to check this "hypothesis".