![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I can't change my first and last name from Russian to English in my profile in the public information section. And I can't upload my avatar. After pressing OK everything returns to its original form. Can what I do wrong?
I have been testing the script for a couple of days on two machines: home(P 1.7, 256Mb) and office(P 3.4, 2Gb)
and I noticed that the same script on one and the same history, on one and the same build(197)
(I copy and carry the entire folder Straighthold Trader) gives different results on different machines.
The tester shows different results (profit), the model used: "By opening prices".
my question is: Is it a glitch or when testing on such different machines
there really is a difference.
Thank you.
one more question about the tester, more precisely about the simulation.
does the simulation mode "All ticks" emulate the normal operation of the terminal?
i.e. at a certain moment a new Bid/Ask is received and Expert Advisor starts ?
That is how it should be, in my opinion, this mode should completely
emulate the terminal operation in normal mode. It turns out that any EA
should finally be positive (in terms of profit) in this mode.
But the problem is that the results in two modes (all ticks and open prices)
I have a discrepancy. How can it be "at open prices" mode is a sampling
or am I wrong ?
I take the data from the Open array, the data in this array should be identical in both
Then why are the results different?
So what mode should I use to test the Expert Advisor ?
I will upload it to you tonight or tomorrow morning.
I was also misled at first by this description, it's just that the line "lot volume step - 0.1" is inappropriate here.
Open as you wish, just range from 0.1 to 5.0 lots.
I can't change my first and last name from Russian to English in my profile in the public information section. And I can't upload my avatar. After pressing OK everything returns to its original form. Can what I do wrong?
I was also misled at first by this description, it's just that the line "lot volume step - 0.1" is inappropriate here.
Open as you like, just range from 0.1 to 5.0 lots.
In my opinion everything is correct! ;)
Hi all.
I've been running an EA on a demo account for a few days now.
First of all: the constant loss of connection - will it be the same on a real account?
I have a docked cell and no connection was lost on the wet side.
Secondly : why such a small history ?
Even on the watch only for 2006 and that with holes in it.
And thirdly - after replacing the 197 build - the test results have changed dramatically (profit - increased almost 2-fold)
I would like to be happy but I don't feel like it.
And how can I imagine an EA working somewhere without control - the organizers will probably provide control,
But why is it so hard - only you - it's just like in the real world with all the communication problems and so on.
How do we control the integrity of DC service?
I will draw any logs if I have to. As they say trust, but verify.
So how can I check? Thanks for the information in advance. The best will win.
to MetaQuotes
I've been testing the script for a couple of days on two home(P 1.7, 256Mb) and office(P 3.4, 2Gb) machines
and noticed that the same script, on the same story, on the same build(197)
(I copy and carry the entire Straighthold Trader folder) gives different results on different machines.
The tester shows different results (profit), the model used: "By opening prices".
The question is: Is it a glitch or when testing on so many different machines
There really is a difference.
Thank you.
Question removed, it must have been a glitch with me, now everything matches.