You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It's too difficult to code, if there are any, which there are, you're unlikely to find them in the public domain. In general, the levels theme is interesting, but it is more for manual trading than for robots.
And in general, there is another topic in this regard. Trading Algorithms. Well, of course, there... In technical analysis books it is written:"to open a position after the breakdown of the level... blah... blah..."... But then we need formalized rules. Not program codes, but algorithms. It would be very interesting to raise the subject of how to algorithmize trading rules of technical analysis. If anyone has interesting resources (books, articles, forums) - share them.
When trading manually, you can assess the level and what is more likely to happen on it - a reversal or breakout, and you can also wait for a false breakout and enter. If you open with a program, you follow the algorithm without any analysis. I struggled with it for a long time and finally the profitability of the bot was reached only when working with averaging if the price went against it.
If the inputs are good, then everything is much easier, but it does not happen all the time.
There are moments when our bots enter the flat, but they are rare. ???
The subject of manual level trading has been discussed for a long time, but bot trading has not, and there is nothing much to discuss, it's not so simple to formalize. The reason is false-breaks, and getting around them in the bot is difficult, and probably not possible.
If you get the trend right, martingale is a super opportunity to make money. I can give you some profitable advice.
If you use a martingale robot, make the initial orders two stop positions. Then the rollback will go like butter.
And the sidewall is like butter with sand.)
THE SIDEWALL IS FINE, TOO.