You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Quite in the spirit of democracy... That's what everyone does...
I repeat. Posting ex5 without source code is self-promotion. A teaser. A cover for true intentions. Free debugging by community members before posting on the market.
The reference to "I don't want to post the source because blah, blah, blah" is either coquetry or an excuse for your not-so-good intentions.
Promises "dudes, I will surely show sources later" are not performed in most cases.
OK, your position is clear.
Let's assume that a person creates a thread. He starts a discussion of some idea for N pages and perhaps even says that later he will create a code based on this thread and post it in the market. There is no code or sources in the thread, just a discussion of the idea itself. The forum members are interested in keeping the conversation going, they are actively discussing it.
Will the moderator delete the thread immediately or will he have to say the cherished word "market"? Or what?
Why continue. I'd like to see that line which, in the new realities, is not allowed to be crossed.
I repeat. Posting ex5 without sources is self-promotion. A teaser. A cover for true intentions. Free debugging by community members before putting it on the market.
The reference to "I don't want to post the source because blah, blah, blah" is either coquetry or an excuse for your not entirely good intentions.
Promises "dudes, I will surely show sources later" are not performed in most cases.
You're wrong and inconsistent.
I don't show my sources either, because they are mine.
why don't you post the source code of the terminal?
Why are we discussing the terminal without the sources?
what is not a good intention in your terminal? backdoor ?
...
why don't you publish the source code of the terminal?
...
And you, pako, are posting in ex5 what is in the source code of the next thread.
So? Can he go to a nearby thread and get the source code or is it too much trouble for him to use the search?
Everything is open in the documentation, and whoever needs it will go and get it.
Why I continue. I would like to see a line that, in the new realities, is not allowed to be crossed.
You won't get an answer.
And you don't need an answer, because you know it beforehand.
Why don't you think that ex5 doesn't need to be posted? I already announced the statistics: since the very beginning of MQL5.com (is it almost 7 years? Or am I mistaken?) there are about 100 themes in all resource, Russian and English sections, where ex5 has been posted. I asked the webs specifically.
You will not get an answer.
And you don't need the answer, because you know it beforehand.
Why don't you believe that ex5 does not need to be posted? I already announced the statistics: since the very beginning of MQL5.com (is it almost 7 years? Or am I mistaken?) there are about 100 themes in all resource, Russian and English sections, where ex5 has been posted. I asked the webs specifically.
With the deletion of the thread and the ban?
Oh, man. From democracy to totalitarianism.
Okay. (chuckles) I only answer for myself: "I don't know."
When the indicator shows the horizontal parts of ticks, which clearly do not correspond to the bars, it is a BEGIN of CopyTicks (it can be fixed by reloading the terminal). Not to be unfounded, I give a proof in the form of an Expert Advisor
and a screenshot
Also, judging by the animated picture
Accessed at
Who has FORTS and ECN, give a report, what are the bugs there (I'm sure there are many).
Now for the subject - artificial MT4/5 indicator buffers. Wanted to have buffers that I can write to by ANY time (not just bar) double-value. And to have these buffers visualised accordingly. I asked how architecturally it's better to create such buffers. I.e. what kind of class we need, what interface to use it in the most convenient way. And, of course, is there a demand for such buffers?
Thanks, the topic is really interesting. The experiment is interesting. Especially the braking of the graph. I did not expect that. True, my tick is open all the time and I'm looking at it more.
Although, perhaps MT has such an algorithm that the Ask line is redrawn by a delta, for example. By the way, the ticks may not be trades, but changes of Bid-Ask, then the candle does not need to be redrawn.
As for the buffers, I don't understand the problem from my words. In a regular dynamical array - whatever you want and how much you want, that's what you may use. Where's the time there?
I'll have to take a look at delays between Bid-Ask and tick values in objects at my leisure. An extra point wouldn't hurt.
ZS Off-topic, but I also don't understand why the candles go at Bid and not at the price of the last trade, like on stock charts.