How can I tell if I have decompiled or not? - page 8

New comment
 
Vladimir Pastushak:
Elementary...
How...? Explain...:)
 
Vladimir Pastushak:
Elementary ...
don't explain
 
Andrey F. Zelinsky:
don't explain

Programmers and programmer help forum ! Don't explain !!!! hah hah ...

 
Ghenadie Tumco:
How...? Explain...:)

It depends on the event at which the signal should appear, but in most cases it is elementary (through iCustom and use of resources) )

ZS: yes even resources are not needed, but it depends on the task.

 
but if the indicator has been compiled from decomile, what about it? )
 
Alexandr Bryzgalov:

It depends on the event at which the signal should appear, but in most cases it is elementary (through iCustom and use of resources) )

ZS: not even resources are needed, but it depends on the task.

I know how to write an indicator that will give out sounds, alerts, etc., from signals of another indicator, but how to add alerts in an indicator that doesn't have them, without opening the code, I don't know ... Is it possible through terminal functions?
 
Ghenadie Tumco:
Wait, I know how to write an indicator that will produce sounds, alerts, etc., from signals of another indicator, but how to add alerts in an indicator that doesn't have them, without opening the code, I don't know... Is it possible through the terminal functions?

You will need to convince the client that you don't need to add anything and you just need sounds.

Or make a shell that calls up the original indicator with rendering and alerts.

Everything looks as if the alerts were really added. And with resources this way the original indicator becomes unnecessary at all.

 
Alexandr Bryzgalov:

Most likely, the customer just want the sounds, then you just need to convince him that he does not need to add anything there, and you just need the sounds.

Or make a shell that calls up the original indicator with rendering and alerts.

Everything looks as if the alerts were really added. And with resources this way the original indicator becomes unnecessary at all.

But the "shell" is a different programme, not the same indicator.

And it says "put the sound in the indicator", not near/above/under/above etc...

Please tell me how it can be done, without the source...

 
Ghenadie Tumco:
But the "shell" is a different programme, not the same indicator.

And it says "put the sound in the indicator", not near/above/under/above etc...

Tell me how you can do this already, without the source...

Imagine that you don't have an indicator source and you need an alert on the arrows.

How do you do it? Think about it. It is not difficult.

This is what everyone who will solve this problem will do.

 
Ghenadie Tumco:
But the "shell" is a different programme, not the same indicator.

And it says "put the sound in the indicator", not near/above/under/above etc...

Tell me how to do this already, without the source...

If we attach the sound to the indicator, everything is correct?

Is it wrong to put the indicator to the sound? )

What is written in the application is often not what the customer actually needs. He just described it the way he understands it.

But if it is principal: to attach sound to indicator, not vice versa, then we lose order for inability to perform.

Another option is to find the source code. They are often available in the public domain.

123456789101112131415...33
New comment