Option levels - page 3

[Mr. Trillioner]

Zogman:

If you can share valuable information, you're welcome, if not, you're welcome. However, I would like to point out that the question was how to draw conclusions about the rate of the futures=spot itself using information about options on the futures (all in Chicago).

I have a question (probably, it's stupid for some people, but for me it's not) - why do people think that these are options on futures? Why not for real asset? Where does it say that?

[Mr. Trillioner]

Zogman:

http://forum.mql4.com/ru/27037/page9

Here found a thread on four - apparently this is one of the initial developments.

Well actually Chuy writes that he has made a profitable turkey, but he won't give it to anyone )). So what is the use?

[Zogman]

https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/38821/page189

and here are the recent discussions in the forecasts thread - there have been many in this thread since january 2015 - rena tried to do some kind of indy - but seems to have been disappointed

[Zogman]

GopFX __:
I have a question (probably dumb for some people, but for me it's not) - why do people think that these are options on futures? Why not for real assets? Where does it say that?

There must be one somewhere, I was told the same thing by the guys in Moscow - it seems there is a rubdoll, a futures and an option.

The underlying asset - the price depends on the marketplace.

I think the option contract should say that the underlying asset is something that is traded on a market.

And it should also say bid or ask crossed the price etc.

[Zogman]

GopFX __:
Well actually chuy writes that he made a profitable turkey, but he won't give it to anyone )) So what's the point?

Well, I didn't have time to read it all.

Isn't that crunch the same http://zukkerro.ru/

or maybe not.

[Alexander Lasygin]

GopFX __:
Chuy says he has made a profitable turkey, but won't give it to anyone )). So what's the point?

I love people who think. I'll give you the link but I don't know if the moderators will let me in. Check it out. Maybe something will come up. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=greNDSgFZ4A&list=PL7k-kU0fpZB4N3unXzeP-PlPM-yaTI7uL

[Zogman]

Alexander Lasygin:
I love people who think. I will give you the link, but I do not know if the moderators miss it. Check it out. Maybe something will come up. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=greNDSgFZ4A&list=PL7k-kU0fpZB4N3unXzeP-PlPM-yaTI7uL

I have watched it several times and may watch it again,

The only thing is that, unlike the canonical mt5 forum, they want to do without volumes, but they want to do it without the volume,

it is rather a mix between sniper and uSA (which Strange likes), but in contrast to the canonical uSA they want to

price changes strongly - it means that a Forex broker is working

and we don't need volumes.

(that's my interpretation)

There are such topics and I think Max Zhivas or someone else - there is a clearer description

[Rustamzhan Salidzhanov]

Zogman:

Well, I didn't have time to read it all.

Isn't that crunch the same http://zukkerro.ru/

Or maybe it's not.

I've never done this shit, just look at the dates.

If anyone's had a burglary, it's me, but I'm not in trouble, the system worked before it became mainstream, and then it wasn't interesting...

[Zogman]

Rustamzhan Salidzhanov:

I've never done this kind of shit, just look at the dates.

if anyone's got fucked up it's me, but I'm not fucked up, the system worked before it became mainstream and then it wasn't interesting...

so you're the crunch... that's... I wonder... Maybe the dickfish will show up...

[Rustamzhan Salidzhanov]

Zogman:

So you're the crunch... that's... I wonder... Maybe the dickfish will show up.

He hasn't gone anywhere, he's been posting on the fourth forum recently.