Theorem on the presence of memory in random sequences - page 6

New comment
 
Dmitry Fedoseev:
Isn't that a bad answer? Where's the money?
God willing © Ostap Bender
 
Dmitry Fedoseev:
Isn't that a bad answer? Where is the money?

You don't have to go on and on.

I have already realised that all your income is scientifically based on probability theory and equals zero, according to the same theory.

 
Yury Reshetov:
Well it is clear that instead of proof, as seems to be "accepted in science", sectarians push their own or collective "indisputable" opinion. After all, for them there are only two opinions: one that coincides with their own, or one that is "knowingly wrong".
Why prove the obvious? If you think you are a great scientist, be kind enough to state your task in intelligible language, and you can't even do that.
 
charter:

You don't have to go on and on.

I have already realised that all your profits are scientifically based on the theory of probability and are zero according to the same theory.

The topic has been abandoned because there is nothing to discuss.

All Reshetov has proved is that from any sufficiently long series of random sequences you can cut a slice on which there will be some regularity with positive MO (rather, with non-zero MO).

That's it. There is nothing to discuss here, as it is already clear and there is nothing new here.

 

You can open Excel and experiment a bit yourself - the formula for PRNG = FATHER.

Create a long enough row and slice inside it.If x 2 > x 1, then bet on x 3 < x 2.

2. If x 2 < x 1 , then bet on x 3 > x 2

Or you may cut a different piece which is the other way round

 
Dmitry Fedoseev:
Why prove the obvious? If you think you are a great scientist, be kind enough to state your task in intelligible language, and you can't even do that.
Of course, only cult members are capable of communicating in the "correct" language. The rest of us, after all, are all ignoramuses and ignoramuses whose arguments are "obviously not obvious".
 

And the rules of the game itself are not laid out.

Suppose Yuri has invented a game of dice that you can definitely win, only no one in the world plays such a game, they play another one.

We're also on a programmers' forum, so why not represent this game in code so that there are no misunderstandings.

 
Дмитрий:
You can open up Excel yourself and experiment - the formula for PRNG =FACTION.
And how to experiment, what to do?
 
Дмитрий:

The topic is abandoned because there is nothing to discuss.

All Reshetov has proved is that from any sufficiently long series of random sequences one can carve a slice on which there will be some regularity with positive MO (rather, with non-zero MO).

That's it. There is nothing to discuss here, as it is already clear and there is nothing new here.

There is a link in the very first post of the author.

Please don't be lazy and read it.

 
Dmitry Fedoseev:
How to experiment, what to do?

You open Excel, enter a formula and specify, for example, =SELF(-2;2). It generates a random number in the range (-2;2). You generate 1000 such numbers - a number series.

And allocate there a chunk, where will beIf x 2 > x 1, then bet on x 3 < x 2 andIf x 2 < x 1, then bet on x 3 > x 2.

Then you choose a piece where it is the other way round

12345678910111213...43
New comment