F - page 16
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
... and another signalling one. The tests showed that 2 is no better than one. But why make more if the result is the same.
I was talking about the histogram. I don't care if it's 100500, the main thing is that there will be a result.)
That's for sure! If there is a result, it will be awesome! For this is the main thing.
And it doesn't matter how it will be achieved - with a tractor or a cunning machine).
Maybe an ACS specialist can help us to draw up a MACDa schematic diagram ....
I confirm, the one I saw used 3 machines. in fact - MACD. as I have repeatedly said before, there is no smell of ACS there. I do not see the point in making out the schematics for such elementary things, and do not ask for it.
That's for sure! If there is a result, it will be awesome! For this is the main thing.
And it does not matter how it will be achieved - with a tractor or a cunning machine).
The system works. Only Oleg is using it in his own way. Not in the way I see it. But after half a year of messing around with it, searching for trends, criteria, reworking, removing unnecessary things and adding something completely different, I see a price direction change in half a minute (depending on the timeframe, it may take up to 15 minutes for a strong signal). I have no nerve to put stops far away according to the system, but I bring them to Breakeven quickly (I have a very small deposit). But if I follow the system precisely, then, uh...
If I had already marked entry points on the chart, partial closing with transfer to Breakeven, all in bull's-eye. Almost... I see only one part of the whole system - the entries and exits. I still need to work out the follow-up and some kind of MM. And one more trick to look at/try... for a nice report schedule ;) And not only for that, also for confidence and peace of mind.
I've poured a lot of water... creepy
I'm not here at first... won't they reveal the essence of the system?)
It's up to the topicstarter.
There's a question for everyone). You, I understand, also know what it's about. You can ask me in person).
The idea is too promising in my opinion to share it so easily. Both from experience of developing it and from my observations of it (I'm talking about my idea, not the methods that Oleg is peddling). There's not much left of the author's idea, just a push in one possible direction. For which I thank him very much.
I share my ideas with only one person who contributes as much as he can and assists in development.
But if I suddenly need help from the community, I will organize a branch of my own. And here I try to at least somehow encourage Oleg, and give him some of my thoughts for general improvement (I hope).
It's up to him whether he listens or not. But I am personally interested in making it work for him.
Maybe an ACS specialist can help us to make a MACD structure chart?
I'm no expert, but I'll give it a shot...
So MAKD... We have two MAs, i.e. two price averages. Theoretically, we obtain probability (taking into account the probability of price behavior of 33-up, 33-down and 33-flat, i.e. at most, only 1 out of 3 entries is correct) 0.33/2=0.165 instead of 0.33, as two MAs are used, and the higher the period, the greater the averaging and therefore the less probable correct entry at higher risks.