FOREX - Trends, forecasts and implications 2015 - page 1882
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Denial of the reality of not succeeding is a defense mechanism against the bitterness of failure.
Yes, I remember what Central Bank said (can't remember who), I hadn't put a muving on before, sawVizard_'s screenshot and decided to take a look myself.
Yes and I'm surprised to see levels working out like that.
I definitely succeeded in it, as I tested all those MAs (and not only) and saw that one should not trade like that. The MT5 has powerful features for that. I will not provide you with the proofs. You go digging. Looks like you still have a long way to go. )
These are not levels worked out, this is a fitting and an attempt to pass off wishful thinking as reality. Urgently get out of this zone of delusion of the majority, otherwise you will just waste your time. In this case, at best, you will get a low yield close to zero. But more likely, you will lose everything you have. ;)
...
it is logical that forecasts are used to make a decision...
Did I say they were talking about simple....
Simple Moving Average ))))
I've definitely succeeded in this as I've tested all these MAs (and more) and seen that you can't trade like that. The MT5 has powerful features for that. I will not give you the proofs. You go digging. Looks like you still have a long way to go. )
These are not levels worked out, this is a fitting and an attempt to pass off wishful thinking as reality. Urgently get out of this zone of delusion of the majority, otherwise you will just waste your time. In this case, at best, you will get a low yield close to zero. But more likely, you will lose everything you have. ;)
I'm working with a lot of muwings and I have got sure that you just can not make money on them - you need a TS that is not very primitive...
Specify, are you suspecting me of fudging or the Central Bank?
Most people's logic is flawed and that's why they always lose.
I'm talking about institutional players - so I gave you an example...
Here we go ))) Generally speaking, when they say "mashka"... they're referring to
Simple Moving Average (Simple Moving Average))))
What makes you think that's the custom?
Let's go from the contrary, if tech analysis doesn't use "big money", why does it work?
I was surprised myself - I can't find the source now, but the talk was that the averageprice of the rouble in 2015 would be 60 roubles, which corresponds to Ma 360 (I think so).
It's been like that all my life... by default... if another one is used, then the smoothing method is specified...