Funny on one hand. All robot customers dream of getting their hands on the grail. - page 6
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Thank you. But I don't understand why the programmer attached graphs and where does he get them from?
I am the customer, but the charts are taken from an EA (tester) that needs to be worked on further, and there is no one willing to do so. Charts for the last 5 years till mid-September 2014, all with double average spread - M15. Maybe someone will be interested in working on an EA...
Can you show the testing statistics for one of the charts?
Yes - USDSGD 01.10.2009-10.10.2014 M15. The peculiarity of this EA is that it works either long or short, because different settings are required.
They do not understand the essence of these two directions (99.5% of orders) and they do not even understand what the Ask and Bid prices actually are (they were told some nonsense on this subject at forex brokerage for simplification).
They do not know what to do and they do not know how to do it.
There's also a fun "throw the broacher" trend. Using the wrong software configuration on the broker's server for profit. Usually brokers are punished for this, severely (take away every penny) and bugs are closed quickly. But sometimes you get lucky.
The court also opens trades on quotes discrepancy with western "normal" brokers.
They do not know what to do and they do not know what to expect. It remains to provide him with quality service for reasonable money, knowing full well in advance that the client spends money to understand his mistake.
It's pretty simple. They are dripping in the wrong direction. They took a ridiculous "one-week free course on how to trade Forex" (not to make money, but to trade, this is important). Where they were explained a simplified (and distorted) picture of how Forex works, showed the terminal and the magic indicators, hinting that this is how you make money. No, they won't. This is a deception. But our patient digs further and gets to the magical martingale (the court, in fact, all the networks, reversal and channel indicators in all possible variations). The patient believes he is the smartest and thinks the grid is not a martingale, he does not want to read the article on Pedovik (it explains why Martin is a fake).
They do not understand the essence of these two directions (99.5% of orders) and they do not even understand what the Ask and Bid prices actually are (they were told some nonsense on this subject at forex brokerage for simplification).
They do not know what to do and they do not know how to do it.
There's also a fun "throw the broacher" trend. Using the wrong software configuration on the broker's server for profit. Usually brokers are punished for this, severely (take away every penny) and bugs are closed quickly. But sometimes you get lucky.
The court also opens trades on quotes discrepancy with western "normal" brokers.
They do not know what to do and they do not know what to expect. It remains to provide him with quality service for reasonable money, knowing full well in advance that the client spends money to understand his mistake.
It makes sense to use martingale if a pattern-driven event is expected with a high probability. A price pullback under certain conditions (even Fibonacci levels) is an unavoidable event. In general, a smart martin has the right to live.
You could also read "Murzilka"....
It makes sense to use martingale if a high probability event is expected which is due to a pattern. A price pullback under certain conditions (even Fibonacci levels) is an unavoidable event. In general, smart martin has the right to life.
Yes - USDSGD 01.10.2009-10.10.2014 M15. The peculiarity of the Expert Advisor is that it works either long or short, as different settings are required.
If it was a test with a constant lot, then it would be OK. But no, in five years - recovery factor to 3 - this is also not good and would not be good even if there is no fact of fitting (optimization in the tester). And given that the Expert Advisor uses the lot multiplier and obviously has a lot of adjustable parameters, it's an absolutely random result. Judging by the test, there is not even a hint of perspective in this robot.