ORDER_POSITION_ID - page 18

New comment
 
Mikalas:
Sasha, this is a very comfortable pose for getting a peak...
Were you into wrestling? Not everyone can appreciate the humour about the stalls, because not everyone is into wrestling, for most people the stalls are a seat in the auditorium.
 
Integer:
Were you into wrestling? Not everyone can appreciate the humour about the stalls, because not everyone is into wrestling, for most people the stalls are a seat in the auditorium.
Well, where would you go without you, darling?
 
papaklass:

For the record, "parterre" refers to the seating in a theatre.

So did Integer help you yesterday?

The most important contribution was made bySerj_Che and after that an invaluable contribution was made byC-4
 
Mikalas:
What's the matter with you, darling?
What's that got to do with me? I didn't wrestle, I went to drama club.
 
papaklass:

For the record, "parterre" refers to the seating in a theatre.

So did Integer help you yesterday?

Writing into the void....

Would you stop it?

I've already said I'm stupid, what more do you want from me?

 
papaklass:

Well that's for everyone. By the way, the person did not thank them either.

Apparently to thank for their help is below his dignity, especially those who do not understand the basics and those who before something to assert something about the history of looking at the history. :)

How about this:

For anyone else wondering, the code, executable and expert log is attached.

MT-5 FORTS

Conclusions:

1. Until the order is completely executed or removed, there is NO history on it.

TheORDER_POSITION_ID for the partially executed order is not set.

Thanks everyone, got it figured out.

Files:

test_orders.zip26 kb

Maybe I am writing in Chinese?

 
papaklass:

No, write in Russian. By the way, I reacted to your posthttps://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/35432/page17#comment_1044587

You stubbornly refuse to answer the question: did Integer help you yesterday?

No, it only misled me.
 
papaklass:

I see.

You have misled yourself. You should have answered your opponent's question first and then written your comment. The discussion would have been much more concrete then. :)

Even today it took you two pages of ranting before you answered a simple question. Progress! Yesterday 17 pages, today only 2.

What do you want from me?

I admit to being a fool, and you insist

to be called that by others!

P/S Now you're giving someone the satisfaction and a hearty laugh!

 
papaklass:
I, too, appreciate these guys' input, thanks to them for the information.

Right, now, let's spit in the direction of the other members of the forum.

Why should I be the only one to spit?

P/S The nimbus suits you very well!

 
Moderators, when you've had enough of reading this, just delete the topic:)
1...1112131415161718192021
New comment