You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Your logic is flawed, mate. If you use solutions like that, you're not thinking straight.
You're very cruelly mistaken ) resonant user is for example hrenfx, and this ... is just a world resentful nerd.Well... he said three words there and got a page of posts with consonants and dissenters. And I'm there in the English-speaking a few threads with my content + indicators + EAs that are nowhere else, etc ... I do not want to go on and on ...
People simply have talent, but they do not use it for its intended purpose. I call such people "resonant".
Let me clarify a bit, if you weren't quite sure what I was talking about.
I'm not talking about the dll, I'm talking about the lack of capability in the current implementation of pipelines to become a server.
Without server pipes, you have to exchange information via files.
And not even via MemoryMapping, but via sandbox.
this is exactly what i said: "within MQL [information exchange] is solved by wiping a hole on the disk. This solution cannot be used in your right mind".
So again, I'm not talking about the lack of dll, but about the inability not to make holes in the hard drive. You can use such a solution, but it is a bad one.
:)
The task is to exchange information between agents of the local machine.
In the framework of MQL it is solved by wiping a hole on the hard disk.
This solution should not be used in your right mind.
Page six of the discussion, and I still don't understand what the product itself is about.
As far as I understand -- something like genetic auto-optimisation.
C-4 just don't want to read the thread, the author's answer is in the thread, on page 3.
C-4 just don't have the heart to read the thread, the author's answer is in the thread, on page 3.
O.C. seems like a good idea in terms of access to computing resources, but the owls themselves need to be profitable. In other words, they will not buy for computing performance, but for results, and these are somewhat different things.
Performance in this case is a secondary element. The essence is the ability to manage the optimization process.
And the market is not only full of owls.
Performance is a secondary element in this case. The point is to be able to manage the optimisation process.
And the market is not just full of owls.
I take it this is a hint at some sort of product, m-m-m-mm... like an optimization manager or something, capable of using the optimizer in real time.