What should be added for additional support of universal mathematical calculations in MQL5 and MQL5 Cloud Network? - page 9
![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Yes, games give a kick in performance and technology. Because they pull the hardware to a qualitative level. (Although one professor I know at uni considered games as universal evil for some reason :)
As for the universality of functions, here are directions for further step-by-step implementation
- weather forecast
- scientific data processing (space, nuclear physics)
- pharmaceutics
- 3D rendering (as a practical application for money)
and then we'll get to the exchange forecast...
PS.
And with UCI, as I said, could make an application for MT :)
I'm not talking about the cloud. The cloud's capabilities are clear. It can also be used outside of MT.
I am talking about MT.
I do not see anything wrong with holding a chess bot competition on the basis of MT. And these same bots will use the computing resources of the cloud.
Maybe actually give up playing forex and play chess? I used to be pretty good at it.
But I like backgammon better. Maybe someone could program backgammon on MT5, I'd be eternally grateful.
Poker! Let's tear up EPT!)))
If we undertake it, we follow through. For example, we implemented AlgLib entirely by ourselves, although there was an idea to involve the community.
So far, there is a feeling that few people really want to participate in the oversourced projects and spend their time.
So far, there is a feeling that few people really want to take part in the oversourced projects and waste their time.
I don't have any experience. I thought you promised to make someone from your team a mentor for the project at the time.
And without a shepherd, the sheep will scatter. So if anyone does anything in the community, they are the only one responsible for their work.
no experience. you sort of promised to make someone from your team a curator for the project.
but without a shepherd the sheep will be scattered. Therefore, if anyone does something in the community, then only he alone is responsible for his work.
More than experience in boltology. Let's blind like that, let's sit down like that, etc. etc. in accordance with the fable of grandfather Krylov called the Quartet. Nobody does anything, everyone with smart faces only expresses their opinions.
No curator is needed to urge everyone on with a stick. The project manager must create the first lines of code - the interfaces of future classes, from which it will already be more or less clear where to dance further, and where is the dead end. And then, some project participant justifies what exactly he is going to do, and if his potential activity does not contradict the general direction, then he is entrusted with the implementation of his idea. Then some other participant connects. Etc. etc.
Here, for example, there was free time, here I threw some sketches of classes for a chess program:
Now you can create a project in the repository and connect additional developers to it. But not all those who want to express some kind of opinion there, but from among those who are going to do something specific.
Yuri, it's pretty clear with chess engines - the topic has been worked out by other people very well.
If you take it on, you have to use the accumulated experience and the 10000 percent set of initial and extremely teeth-grinding optimisations (bitcards, presets, etc.).
You can't start from scratch with ABCs and mistakes. No "premature optimization is evil". Here you need at once an extreme experience in implementing chess-based numerical calculations.
Fortunately there are many articles, sources, and detailed explanations of them in the public domain. As you start reading on the subject, you will immediately understand the extreme level of solutions achieved.
Yuri, it's pretty clear with chess engines - the topic has been worked out by other people very well.
If you take it on, you have to use the accumulated experience and the 10000 percent set of initial and extremely toothy optimisations (bitcards, presets, etc.).
You can't start from scratch with ABCs and mistakes. No "premature optimization is evil". Here you need at once an extreme experience in implementing chess-based numerical calculations.
Fortunately there are many articles, sources, and detailed explanations of them in the public domain. As soon as you start reading on the subject you'll immediately understand the extreme level of solutions achieved.
I've got some literature too, and Botvinnik is still in paper form. And I have some developments, of course, not in MQL5, but in muLisp.
I`ve tried to show some local projectors that they don`t need supervisors for their projects. I have a need for a team of specific developers, who may not be experts in all technologies, and can even be specialists in their field, but nonetheless, they are competent in their field. And you need a project manager who will initially think through and prepare all of this for the rest of the team, so that the project doesn't start from scratch, and you can get down to it right away, after the introductory excursus. Otherwise, things will not get off the ground.