Suggestions, comments, errors on the Signals service - page 32
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
In general, a lot of statistics are given for each signal, including several graphs. For the thinking reader, this is not a problem.
There is no ready-made magic formula or methodology that "points the finger to the Grail". You can offer your own estimation options in specific sentences.
In general, a lot of statistics are given for each signal, including several graphs. For the thinking reader, this is not a problem.
There is no ready-made magic formula or methodology that "points the finger to the Grail". You can offer your own estimation options in concrete sentences.
Yes, already tired of writing that we should evaluate by equity, but MQ doesn't hear.
Or pretends not to.
How to remove the signal completely from the base ?
In general, a lot of statistics are given for each signal, including several graphs. For the thinking reader, this is not a problem.
There is no ready-made magic formula or methodology that "points the finger to the Grail". You are free to offer your own assessment options in specific sentences.
There is no bullshit - there was a 90% drop in the balance, and it is honestly what it shows. It's easy to spot on the Balance graph yourself
Rashid, thank you for your reply. It turns out that this is the logic of calculations, although for me it is still incomprehensible.
Could you finally clear up the situation for me?
I'm interested in the following question - with the current state of my signal account, what should be the balance value for the increase to be positive?
And another question - what is the fundamental difference between my signal and https://www.mql5.com/ru/signals/1510 ? Even the balance curves are similar, and the account was down by 99%, but the signal has a strong growth of 6000%.
I think I was too hasty to publish the signal, especially since among the "pumped" comrades he with his burdened by manual trading past is not much of a chance.