Question on working with stops: classic on limiters + stops integrated into position - page 13
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
buy stop on open and sell stop limit on close
Ha! Neat :)
A linked order is simulated through the cracks.
Instead of specifying two prices, I have to specify three prices. Because the order price for sell-stop-limit is the same as the buy-stop price.
But they are not related, that's why I rang the bell.
The person is mistaken to think that they are linked.
How can they not be related if his task is to open a buy and put a stop-loss on its volume.
All this is solved by a bunch - bystop + selfplimit
But they're not coherent, that's why I rang the bell.
The person is wrong to think that they are linked.
They are connected because the order price for the sell-stop limit is the same as the buy-stop price.
And if you simulate more complex designs, the price duplication will be repeated more and more.
All in all, guys, I think you've got it all figured out for yourselves from this example. And if you don't understand it, you will one day anyway. No further questions.
Ha! Neat :)
Yes, it is!
A binding order is simulated.
Nothing is simulated. everything works as you want it to. and is processed on the server side. without any experts.
You will close with exactly the same amount of volume as specified in the SellStopLimit.
Instead of specifying two prices, I have to specify three prices. Because the order price for the sell stop limit is the same as the buy stop price.
Ha! Neat :)
A linked order is simulated through the cracks.
Instead of specifying two prices, I have to specify three prices. Because the order price for sell/stop limit is the same as the buy/stop price.
To be honest, I have never tried to get a job as a programmer, but it sounds kind of lame.
and what does the applicant say in the HR department, i'm Vasya Pupkin, i'm a programmer ??? and how does the sheep in C++ from HR department check it?
The human resources department will check the documents that they have, check the employment records (if necessary).
If necessary, they will send you to an expert, or ask for a "portfolio" (on a flash drive, on a disk or by e-mail).
If you are sent to the expert, it is either the direct client or the head of the programmers there will be an interview (with the application of terminology and identification of a skilful candidate in the subject area).
They may also give you a test task, but this is for the very "green" students.
The personnel department will check the documents you have and check your employment record (if necessary).
If necessary, they will send you to a specialist, or ask for a "portfolio" (on a flash drive, on a disk or by e-mail).
If you are sent to an expert, this is the direct client or the head of the programmers there will be an interview (with the application of terminology and identification of a skilful candidate in the subject area).
They may also give you a test assignment, but this is for the very "green".
Come on, it's interesting to look at the level of questions, compare them with yours, so to speak.
Yes, on the MQ server it is very usable, but I can't say the same about the performance of the stockbrokers.
i can do something about it, what's the best way? what kind of questions to ask them?
I do not know if it is possible to raise the handwriting. or maybe you could write a manual for them?
In general, stockbrokers do not have any problems with immediately placed stops (within a reasonable distance).
Rather, they just play it safe.
Let me ask you a question about C++.)