Interesting and Humour - page 4738
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
is not incorrect because randomness at 0 is 25%. In general since there is 0% the probability of no correct answer is the correct answer. This again leads to a number of 25%.
Even in theory, the answer cannot be 25% because there are 3 answers, not 4.
reading the question it can be answered and the answer will be 25% based only on the number of answer options. there are 4 of them.....
...... let's say we make all the numbers closed.
Besides, we are talking about options, i.e. the options are still 4, only the number of answers has decreased.Unfortunately, you missed one section in the middle. If you look carefully, you'll notice it.
If anyone draws it correctly, a ten-figure reward from me.
I think it's easier to skip straight to the mate explanation of why it can't be done.
Even in theory, the answer cannot be 25%, because there are 3 answers, not 4.
If there is no correct answer in the answers, there is no point in solving the problem.
There is a correct answer according to the rules of the game. Based on that there is a solution.
I think it's easier to go straight to the matte explanation of why it can't be done.
That's the answer I was waiting for. You were the first to guess.
But maybe you can mathematically justify it? From your point of view.
reading the question it can be answered and the answer will be 25% based only on the number of answer options. there are 4 of them.....
...... let's say we make all the numbers closed.
Unfortunately, you missed one section in the middle. If you look carefully, you'll notice it.
If anyone draws it correctly, a bonus of 10 zabugmarks from me.
This problem is as old as I am familiar with computers, while I am familiar with IBM 286 and a little bit with the synclair. Search thoroughly the lack of solution of this problem. Hence you may safely multiply the proposed reward by 1 with more zeros.
This problem is as old as I am familiar with computers, and I am familiar with the IBM 286 and a little bit of the synclair. Look more carefully for an explanation of the lack of a solution to this problem. Hence you may safely multiply the offered reward by 1 with more zeros.
I became acquainted with this problem in 1973. But it existed long before that. You don't need a computer to solve it.
I was introduced to this problem in 1973. But it existed long before that. You don't need a computer to solve it.
I did not say that the solution had to be on a computer. I just found out about this problem when I had some of the hardware in my computer replaced.
And the date is still down by about 20 years..............................