Interesting and Humour - page 4309
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
In the beginning there was nothing, just total symmetry,
That would probably be better:
In the beginning there was nothing, only total singularity,
Electric car concept unveiled as Tesla competitor
https://www.bfm.ru/news/392981
Found it on Facebook - the creation of the world as presented today -
-----------------
Cool! Haven't seen this version of the creation from the Standard Model yet.
Cool! Haven't seen this version of the creation from the Standard Model yet.
In five thousand years they will "laugh" at this variant too (a kind of barbaric level of thinking).
This level of thinking can still be laughed at. In fact, that's what it was written for...
I would like to point out that particles of matter have been elevated to the status of "characters". A man animates everything he knows and even what he invents.
It is not only ridiculous to tell how a chain of complex scientific entities supposedly emerges from "Nothing", but the fact that there is a "scientific" assumption of "Emergence from Nothing" taken as a basis of the scientific view of the Universe.
Like "we physicists are great scientists and always follow logic and facts, but in this particular case we assume that EVERYTHING HAS BEEN born out of NOTHING.").
It is not only ridiculous to tell how a chain of complex scientific entities supposedly arises from "Nothing", but the very fact that there is a "scientific" assumption of "Emergence from Nothing", taken as the basis of the scientific doctrine of the Universe.
(1) Like "we physicists are great scientists and we always follow logic and facts, but in this particular case we allow that EVERYTHING HAS BEEN born out of NOTHING.")
(1) No one actually says so, people there are reasonable and sensitive. Everyone understands that they work with models.
When approaching a singularity, the uncertainty of time drops to zero and therefore, according to the uncertainty relation, infinite energy (as fluctuations) is possible. This is where ALL arises, i.e. there is nothing wrong with logic within quantum mechanics.
(1) No one actually says that, people there are sensible and sensitive. Everyone understands that they work with models.
When approaching a singularity, the uncertainty of time drops to zero and hence, according to the uncertainty relation, infinite energy (as fluctuations) is possible. This is where ALL arises, i.e. there is nothing wrong with logic within quantum mechanics.
Orderly thinking requires clarity.
1. Is Singularity a property of an Object, Process, State or the Object itself? If Property, Process or State - then these entities cannot exist without the Object itself, because they are derived from it. Not the cause of the Object's existence, but a consequence of its existence. Thus, whatever Singularity is, it is a derivative of the existence of the Object (or Objects).
2. Indeterminacy, Time Indeterminacy, Infinite Energy, are not independent entities. Neither in Physics nor in Mathematics. Talking about them without reference to the Object is like talking about our forum in that style:
"The difference of opinion striving for unity has indefinitely affected the coefficient of agreement. That's how our forum came to be!".
1.Property is always secondary. No Property of an Object, is the cause of existence of the Object. Therefore, in the beginning there could be neither Energy, nor Singularity, nor anything similar. These concepts are derivatives of the Object.
2. Absolute beginning is required by our Consciousness (perhaps because its own nature is initial-final), but this does not mean that Being itself needs an "absolute beginning". Being can be a timeless self-contained process. In other words, Time (in our linear representation), exists within Being, not Being exists within Time. And it is logical. It's just that such an arrangement is very hard for a person to understand.
imho.
Orderly thinking requires clarity.
1. Is Singularity a property of the Object, a Process, a State or the Object itself? If Property, Process or State - then these entities cannot exist without the Object itself, because they are derived from it. Not the cause of the Object's existence, but a consequence of its existence. Thus, whatever Singularity is, it is a derivative of the existence of the Object (or Objects).
2. Indeterminacy, Time Indeterminacy, Infinite Energy, are not independent entities. Neither in Physics nor in Mathematics. Talking about them without reference to the Object is like talking about our forum in that style:
"The difference of opinion striving for unity has indefinitely affected the coefficient of agreement. Thus our forum was born!".
The singularity here is the starting state of the Universe, which of course exists along with this Universe itself (it also has these uncertainties and energy inherent in it).
It's not like object-oriented programming.