Interesting and Humour - page 3751
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
:).
Do you need arguments that the humanity of a society is not determined by its attitude towards prostitution?
Do you want arguments that in modern life there are many more avenues of existence than death in the army or seclusion in a monastery?
So what arguments do you want to see?
I wrote about weak radioactivity, which one do you mean? The kind that has a level at which a person dies? Any poison in small doses is medicine and in large doses is a killer.
At all NPPs (where I have been) the local newspapers say "radiation background does not exceed natural values measured before the launch of the plant".
Why do we need to rejuvenate cells (read: kill the old ones and give birth to new ones instead) if the cells have a limited resource for division?
Why? So they can die faster?
If you want to live longer, you should not speed up your metabolism and, as a consequence, renew cells, but on the contrary, slow it down. And slower metabolism leads to fewer division cycles and, as a consequence, fewer mutations.
Hence the rhetorical question: how do mutations help people live longer? They do not.
ZZZY Mutations are not useful for humans, but for another subject of evolution called the "Population".
At all NPPs (where I was) the local newspapers say that the radiation background does not exceed the natural values measured before the launch of the plant.
Why do we need to rejuvenate cells (read: kill the old ones and give birth to new ones instead) if the cells have a limited resource for division?
Why? So they can die faster?
If you want to live longer, you should not speed up your metabolism and, as a consequence, renew cells, but on the contrary, slow it down. And slower metabolism leads to fewer division cycles and, as a consequence, fewer mutations.
Hence the rhetorical question: how do mutations help to live longer? They do not.
Without scientific research, it is impossible to conclude unequivocally that cells die when the radioactivity is weak. First of all it depends on type of radiation, on energy value of its particles, and on radiation density (number of particles per square centimeter). Perhaps there is a level at which the cells do not die, the radiation titillates (stimulates) them. Indeed, they did a comparative study of people in Japan. Those who were exposed to low levels of radiation and those who were not exposed. Among those who were weakly exposed there were more long-livers.
Without scientific research, it cannot be unequivocally concluded that cells die when radioactivity is weak. Firstly, it depends on the type of radiation, on the energy value of its particles, as well as on the density of the radiation (number of particles per square cm). Perhaps there is a level at which the cells do not die, the radiation titillates (stimulates) them. Indeed, they did a comparative study of people in Japan. Those who were exposed to low levels of radiation and those who were not exposed. There were more long-livers among those who were slightly irradiated.
I wrote about them just above. The study there wasn't correct. There was a study of the area, and there were more long-livers compared to other areas. The study of the area does not take into account the dead (so-called short-lived), and in vain.
Accordingly, the sample is not complete in order to draw the conclusion the researchers drew.
:).
Do you need arguments that the humanity of a society is not determined by its attitude towards prostitution?
Do you want arguments that in modern life there are many more avenues of existence than death in the army or seclusion in a monastery?
So what arguments do you want to see?
It goes to extremes.
And the attitude towards prostitution determines the humanity of society.
For whom exactly and in what society? Some don't find ways and jump off bridges.
I don't really care about your opinion.
khorosh:
It has long been known that mutation is due to radioactivity. Now it is believed that weak radioactivity is good for the body. It stimulates rejuvenation of cells and the whole organism. It has been observed that many Japanese who were exposed to weak radioactivity in 1945 became long-livers.
And this reeks of nonsense altogether.
You back that up with your "it's been known for a long time" and other "obvious" evidence.
...
It's just that women have a blood purification mechanism for most of their lives that men don't have, hence men live slightly less than women. But this is not a mutation (a random process by definition), but a quite stationary process of body contamination.
Donors are also supposed to live longer.
Socialism has gone by the wayside, and with it socialist values.
There was no socialism at all.
Well, maybe in the city of Moscow and St. Petersburg in some places.
Google the theory of greater male variability.
And this smacks of nonsense altogether.
Back that up with your "it's been known for a long time" and other "obvious" references.
Don't litter the Russian language with English words written in Russian letters. This is a Russian-language forum and you may not be understood. There are Russian equivalents.
The mechanism of the therapeutic effect of small doses of radonotherapy is explained by the law of Arndt-Schultz, which was discovered in 1855: weak stimuli stimulate vital activity, medium stimuli support it, strong stimuli inhibit it and superstrong ones destroy it.
In case you don't know, I will remind you. Radon is a radioactive gas.
From the history of radon baths
People knewabout the healing properties of radon baths long before the discovery of radioactivity. They noted that after bathing in certain springs and staying in caves, they gained strength and relieved themselves of any illnesses. Baden-Baden's waters were already known to the Romans. The Romans built large bathing facilities for their soldiers at the springs of the Civitas Anurelia Aquensis, as Baden-Baden was called at the time, and in 214 AD. - the imperial baths - the Baths of Caracalla. centuries later, in 1861, R. Bunsen did the first chemical analysis of the famous spa waters and in 1904, physicist H.F. Heitel and a Baden-Baden resident, pharmacist O. Ressler discovered the radioactivity of the Baden waters. In the same year the radioactivity of numerous thermal healing springs of another German spa town, Bad Kreuznach, built in 1817, was also discovered and the first radon inhalation centre in the world was opened there in 1912 - after the discovery of radon mines...
Read more here.
However, the doses should not be exceeded. Ingestion of high doses of radon may lead to lung cancer.