More flexible language in the 0. 01% of the time you may need it - General

Sergei Vladimirov 2016.09.21 10:15 #16921

fxsaber:

There really is no dog there. The priority in overload can be set in the compiler, as the developers did with the first two calls.

Well, they didn't in the third one. I still insist that this example is a programmer's mistake. Of course, it's good that the compiler fixes some of these errors, but they are still errors.

INF error for only Trailing Stop - Invalid What are all the

fxsaber 2016.09.21 10:16 #16922

Комбинатор:
Yes, but my understanding is that it shouldn't be there at all )

Are you saying that the compiler should have guessed for f(5) to call it?

void f(const int x)

We discussed this somewhere recently with you on the example of OnBookEvent performance.

fxsaber 2016.09.21 10:17 #16923

Sergei Vladimirov:
Well, in the third one, they didn't. I still insist that this example is a programmer's error. It's good, of course, that the compiler fixes some of these errors, but they are still errors.

This is not an error but a language feature. Which is quite reasonable to use since it exists.