Errors, bugs, questions - page 1361
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Strange (looked at the log file). From experience, if there is an update, it takes literally three seconds for the download to start after connection.
On local PCs, it does. It downloads everywhere. Such hassle only on a dedicated virtual server for vindovs-server for I think the year 2007.
How can we leave the= operator unchanged, if it causes confusion between the pointers and the objects themselves? If we use * for it, we should use it for all the other operators as well. There should be a single standard.
In fact, you offer a simple and clear notation
Replace with And this is for what? So that you can writewhile a special function can be used to compare pointers to equality, and all other arithmetic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, etc.) with pointers have no sense per se, and are interesting only in terms of their overloading capability.
Only by creating a mathematical base and derived class, redefining several (rather than one or two) arithmetic operations, making them virtual and then testing complex expressions (not just a = b + c) on their basis - only this will bring you closer to understanding that everything is now done OPTIMALLY. In the meantime, you're reasoning at an entry level.
If you carry comparison of pointers to equality into a separate function, there will remain only one(!) bottleneck
which however should also be treated as an assignment and not an operator=() call, because currently there is no other syntax for assigning a value to a pointer, while a.operator=( b ) can be called explicitly as well.And what you propose, that the compiler itself chooses the right option - this is wrong. There will be a lot of hard to catch errors.
You are missing the point of the suggestions. Bringing pointer-to-equality comparison operations into a separate function may reduce the probability of an error, but not increase it at all.
Rule #1 - use a special function to compare pointers to equality.
Rule #2 - do not use equality pointer comparison outside of a special function, although the language provides this syntax (for advanced users)
What hard-to-find errors?
Please reconsider the function of the
of the standard library
there are symbols with execution type - stock but do not support fill type
but only
ORDER_FILLING_RETURN
automatically use this part of the cTrade library does not work with such symbols
On the local computers, it does. It loads everywhere. Such a hassle only on a dedicated virtual server under the vinds-server I think 2007.
My local, no proxy, with Metaquotes-Demo connection and multiple reboots is still 1150.
I may be out of the loop, but... When I look at the signal statistics at MQL5.com, there is a section called "Slippage". It says that it is measured in points. What is considered to be a pip? Is it the penultimate digit of the currency pair? Or is it the extreme value? For example, the pair USD/JPY is now at 119.793. Or the pair EUR/USD is at 1.13693. Where are the points?
Thank you!
What kind of perversion on the part of the Market moderators?
My product only works on currency 3 and 5 marks ( this is stated in the description )
And they won't put up a new version because there's a mistake in the product.
2015.08.26 15:43:03.415 2015.03.03 04:02 Hedging_Recovery__1 XAUUSD,H1: OrderSend error 130
I clearly told them that it is only for currencies and not metals.
Who is right or what they want from me?
It's easier for me to put a ban on metals
I may be out of the loop, but... When I look at the signal statistics at MQL5.com, there is a section called "Slippage". It says that it is measured in points. What is considered to be a pip? Is it the penultimate digit of the currency pair? Or is it the extreme value? For example, the pair USD/JPY is now at 119.793. Or the pair EUR/USD is at 1.13693. Where are the points?
Thank you!
1 last digit behind the dot