You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
But with Gartley 222 and Pessavento I know them intimately and am not particularly inclined to their labours.
With the weekly, the question of whether to do it on the basis of 5 working days or the whole week, greatly affects the slope of the diagonals.
Little knowledge of the methods and applications of muray levels, suggest literature
If the theory, then it is correct to use all days of the week, that is 7; practically, of course, it is interesting to use external parameters and see the difference
Yes I also noticed that weekly (7) gives more interesting levels, but the thing is that the original indicator counts for 5 days, that's why I ask ;)
Anyway, I will make a switch.
By the way, is the same question about monthly?
Huh, don't you have any books on the subject?
After all, reading the creator's comments makes a lot of sense =)
Theoretically it is correct to use all days of the week, i.e. 7, but practically it is interesting to use external parameters and see the difference
Weekly indicator is ready.
Pivot_ESAZ_Weekly_GMT.mq5
Input parameters:
COMPLETE_WEEK, // Full week
WORKING_DAYS // 5 working days
Again all calculations by GMT
Huh, don't you have any books on the subject?
After all, reading the creator's comments makes a lot of sense =)
Weekly indicator is ready.
Pivot_ESAZ_Weekly_GMT.mq5
Input parameters:
COMPLETE_WEEK, // full week
WORKING_DAYS // 5 working days
Again all calculations by GMT
but no observation can compare to the comments from the creators
That's what I realized when I read Larry Pessavento's work.
wielder chuck farleigh thomas d elder
it's the gist and the theory that's important.
Larry has interesting things with his sections that determine the current position of the price at what stage it is relative to the wave.
Well, everyone has his own methods, of course, but I don't mind reading a couple hundred English texts
Okay, I'm gonna go climb a spider.
besides, after reading the work, you get a certain understanding of the indicators
what they actually show, not what they seem to show