1200 subscribers!!! - page 31
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You pretend to either ignore it or you don't want to understand it...
I said that the slippage is not large and not necessarily for the worse for subscribers...
and it took you a few pages after Renat said it to figure it out in your post
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/167008/page17#comment_4007730
Yura, a question: there is a difference between "to show the quantity of subscribers" and "to take into account the quantity of subscribers in total rating"?
It must be important.
And here it would be nice to be able to count ratings optionally
[x] - Account number of subscribers
[x] - Take into account trader's children born out of wedlock (this is for fun - as an example), please do not kick me.
If you want to be sure that the rating cannot be calculated based on your own judgement, then you won't have any problems at all.
I remember there was a similar thread with the last few pages about the Market. As I see it, the root of the problem is the same:
the producer-consumer chain is diligently excluded from the seller/intermediary/specialist/partner (call it what you like).
hence the rebellion "unscrupulous producer/supplier rules" and "goods in the top promote themselves.
If the top presented on the site someone is not satisfied, you can make your own alternative. All the wealth of information for this is. But here's a clear way to capitalize on the investment and labor without the approval of MQ "intermediary" services I do not see.
This thread is about Signals service - it's strange that you don't notice it for some reason.
All discussion revolves around one question - whether it is correct to take into account such an indicator as "the number of subscribers" in the rating of signals.
In parallel in constructive discussion of this question - you and others like you with words: "bile", "toad", "stifle" and others.
It is not hard to see that no one pays attention to such comments.
And it is very strange that you and others like you don't want to understand - no one is interested in Taras' signal in this thread, no one is interested in Signals service and how to position your signal in this service - do you understand?
And that's the reaction of you and people like you and that's the intrigue and the fight -- which is what appeals to me from a psychological point of view -- as people's reaction.
Is the signal service being discussed? Is it? Oops, I think I'm in the wrong place....))
All discussion revolves around one question - whether it is correct to consider such an indicator as "number of subscribers" in signals rating.
The whole discussion revolves around the fact that someone is not satisfied with one particular signal. And on related topics.
And it is very strange that you and people like you don't want to understand - no one is interested in Taras signal in this thread, no one is interested in Signals service and how to position your signal in this service - you understand?
Me and people like me, you and people like you... Ahaha, if you think that your "jokes" will hurt me, you're wrong. No one cares about Taras' signal, OK? You've been following him for a long time now, you've studied his trading, his drawdowns, his signal profit and so on... )))) No one is interested in the fierce truth... There are so many contradictions in your own words ... but I'd rather just smile while reading your posts ...) Smile! You are read))
As for the profit of the service, it is more profitable for the service to have subscribers scattered among different providers, explain why?
That's what happened the day before yesterday. What is the reason why you decided to speculate on this topic, two days after a complete breakdown, as if nothing had happened?
Yes. I know you can't...
But I think that signal shouldn't have appeared either...
if you allow me to, I'll delete the title in that post...
I did (26 posts), reported to the admins and all moderators.
Now again, and now because of you? Are you sure you know that signaller won't turn?
And you know that they ban for this ...
Discuss in the service desks, or discuss so that "no one understood anything" (so that I did not understand for example), or get the approval of the admins (as a moderator here is not the only ...).
Is the signal service being discussed? Really? Oops, I think I'm in the wrong place....))
The whole discussion here revolves around someone not being happy with one particular signal. And on related topics.
Me and people like me, you and people like you... Ahahaha, if you think your "tweaks" are going to hurt me, you're wrong. No one is interested in Taras' signal, OK? You've been following him for a long time now, you've studied his trading, his drawdowns, his signal profit and so on... )))) No one is interested in the fierce truth... There are so many contradictions in your own words ... but I'd rather just smile while reading your posts ...) Smile! You are being read))
Ahaha, if you think your "jokes" are going to hurt me, you're wrong. ...
Well, it did. So I'm not wrong.
No one cares about Taras' signal, OK? You've been following him for a long time, you've studied his trading style, his drawdowns, his signal profitability and so on. )))) No one is interested in the fierce truth... There are so many contradictions in your own words...
You don't understand well the difference between the words "general" and "private". Taras' signal is an example. You can't talk about service without giving an example. You can't observe service without observing a particular signal.
And saying "no one cares about the Taras signal" -- that was said in the context of phrases thrown around by you and others like you: "bile," "toad," and others.
Okay. It's hard to explain, it turns out. I tried to put it into different words. But I guess it didn't work. So: "goodbye. I'm done with you."
in the terminal -- in the Terminal panel -- there is a Signals tab
She doesn't need to say anything about mql5.com
p.s. Taras, you sometimes make very strange statements - I sometimes doubt that you personally know anything about signals in general or your signal in particular.
Maybe this is because my terminal does not connect to mql5 site... but maybe it's because of brokers
For you personally: I can prove with a skype story, but my time should be compensated in some way...
for example you will promise next time to doubt my words in silence