Features of the mql5 language, subtleties and tricks - page 115
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I won't write what I can, in case it turns out to be simple and pavlick_ again
I don't understand your behaviour.
Casting a pointer won't do anything. No matter how you cast it, the object is the same.
I stand corrected.
Who tried to test on real ticks, is it necessary to create a 1-minute history or it will be formed on the basis of uploaded ticks(custom symbol)?
I somehow don't have a test, I've uploaded seven days of ticks, I'm running the test and this is what's in the logs:
Who tried to test on real ticks, is it necessary to create a 1-minute history or it will be formed on the basis of uploaded ticks (custom symbol)?
I'm somehow not going to test, uploaded seven days of ticks, running the test is what's in the logs:
So far.
DoubleToString for "same" price calculations can give different results. In this case DoubleToString may be different from NormalizeDouble.
DoubleToString for "same" price calculations can give different results. In this case DoubleToString may be different from NormalizeDouble.
If anyone needs a template unresolved static variable based on https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/1111/page2364#comment_10048274
The problem is solved by implementing the method at the declaration place. It's not very nice, but it works.
If anyone needs a template unresolved static variable based on https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/1111/page2364#comment_10048274
The problem is solved by implementing the method at the declaration place. It is not very nice, but it works.
You have an extra word static there. It is not used outside a class
You have an extra word static listed there. It is not used outside the class.
(tired) if it were the problem, the "'k' - redefinition; different type modifiers" error would have appeared, but it is not on the screenshot. So the compiler doesn't care and that's not it.