Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 2760
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Less aplomb and more learning from other people. and you'll be digitally happy.
clearly not from you to learn, as your aplomb here - also contradicting the common sense logic of studying and choosing predictors (from Aleksey Nikolayev )...
start following your own advice
p.s. I left explanations in the p.s. of the previous post.... after your ma-keys on this issue any substantive dialogue is impossible in principle ... if you see insults in all your arguments, you should have dialogues with other specialists....
That's the problem!
That is why I write that years have been spent on this thread mostly on nonsense. If you manage to find predictors, you will have a trading system. If you fail, it is not your destiny.
PS.
As a teacher, take the price increment, or rather a sign. VLADIMIR PERERVENKO has given very good predictors in his articles.
I tried it according to his articles. In the article a successful period/instrument - the balance line is still more or less decent. On other periods the balance line approaches the horizontal line (on new data).
So I try other target periods. But on them the balance is also horizontal at best.
Tried it on his articles. In a successful period/instrument - the balance line is still more or less decent. On other periods the balance line approaches the horizontal line (on new data).
So I try other target periods. But on them the balance is also horizontal at best.
What does balance have to do with it?
First we need to achieve a prediction error of less than 30%, and then balance.
What's balance got to do with it?
First you need to achieve a prediction error of less than 30%, and then balance.
According to the articles, it turns out to be less than 30%. But it won't earn money, because the balance is not drained at best.
And all these diagrams are just a consequence of randomly picking traits, without understanding
1. Where did you see a randomisation of features? There's not even a whiff of that in there.
2. There is no Buy and Sell and nothing else in the terminal.
3. Interesting to see. What is random markup? Random what?
Balance is the main goal.
According to the articles, it turns out to be less than 30%. But it will not give you a chance to earn, as the balance is not drained at best.
Don't confuse God's gift with eggs.
Do you have a model with prediction error less than 30%? Can you show it?
PS. Developing an Expert Advisor using signals from MO is a separate problem. Let's leave it aside for now.
1. Where did you see a random selection of traits? It doesn't even smell that way.
2. There is no Buy and Sell and nothing else in the terminal.
3. Interesting to see. What is random markup? Random what?
I didn't see any meaningful feature selection in those articles. Meaningful in the sense of not choosing from a pile, but making an informative markup chip-target at once. It is possible to select target features for any feature. This is impossible with increments. We will have to select target attributes under target attributes.
"Meaningful" - this is according to the pictures I have given, which make"informative markup chip-target at once".
And what do you mean by "meaningful"?