Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 3546
![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
pen test
You made a bot already? You're a monster.
Turns out Tinkov Bank has its own lib for BP :)
I didn't find anything special inside
https://etna.tinkoff.ru/
You made a bot already? Monster.
More like an underbot, just enters and sets stop, but it's enough for me for now.
It is interesting to observe how the signal is formed, etc...
It's more of an under-robot, just enters and stops, but that's good enough for me for now.
It is interesting to observe how the signal is formed, etc...
You can also try splines, but it is only for marking on the history.
Your way is more flexible in this respect, although I would still compare errors on the track/test. It should be obviously worse on the test.
Later I will try your method for marking trades and compare it with splines, for example.
In your case it is probably better to use some multiple Bayesian regression. To equalise the errors on the trayne/test.
You can also try splines, but that's only for markup on history.
Your way is more flexible in this respect, though I would still compare errors on trace/test. It should be obviously worse on the test.
Later I will try your method for marking trades and compare it with splines, for example.
Try to do exactly as I did, build a candlestick price pattern...
The point here is not in the error and not in the curve fitted to the price, the point is in the study of the model itself and it does not matter whether it has diverged from the price or not.
try doing exactly what I did, build a candlestick price pattern...
The point here is not in the error and not in the curve fitted to the price, the point is in the study of the model itself and it does not matter whether it has moved with the price or not.
I'll try it later. For now I'm expanding my arsenal of label markers. Your way works :)
But you should also try to build an unbiased model.But you should also try to build an unbiased model.
I don't understand why, because my signals are based on the model, so you don't have to look at the price at all...
Morning trading with the robot, he opens a position and puts a take, stop, I manage it further...
I only show the beginning of the day, because I'm ashamed of it... I started to cheat...
I don't understand why, because my signals are based on the model, so you don't have to look at the price at all.
Morning trading with the robot, he opens a position and puts a take and stop, I manage it further....
I show only the beginning of the day, because I'm ashamed of it... I started to cheat...
Well, because you have a dependence of the model on prices (signs), and over time it floats/shifts.
Well, let it float, it doesn't change dramatically...
And my trading rules are inside the model and are not connected with the real price.
Well, let it float away, it's not like it's going away...
And my trading rules are inside the model and are not connected with the real price.