Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 3301
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
like that?
and can it really handle a million conditions?
I'm a bit lost with this switch and C++ stuff.
The first two functions are R implementation, the last one is switch in C++.
I'm a bit lost with this switch and C++ thing.
the first two functions are R implementation, the last one is switch in C++.
Can you show me the code?
Probably you are wasting a function when the answer has already been received...
Can you show me the code?
Probably you are running the function in vain, when the answer is already received...
The code is the same as you posted, except I made the rules 300 instead of 5
The question is in the code of the function call.
The question is in the function call code.
Basically no gain at all, how can that be...
There's a lot of things that could be. The script is attached, below is the function part.
Result.
It is not clear what is measured here - see the highlighted comments. Allegedly much faster than rule2.
Interestingly, in terms of having a quantity of data (quotes), the human brain (as a neural network) compared to MO is like an infusoria compared to a human.
However, so primitive humans have proven that they can create pretty good working TCs. It turns out that it does not require such a huge amount of data to create a working TC.
It is a mystery to me how, for example, man got to the point of working scalper models. It was done almost entirely without number crunchers.
The scenario for this was apparently something like this:
Apparently, on some subconscious human brain is still able to find "patterns" on extremely small amount of data. You can't call it luck. It's a mystery.
Imho, the whole secret is in the transfer of experience, everything new is built on the achievements of the previous generation. Take modern processors. For people from the 19th century it will be magic. For the 20th century, it will be a very complex technology that will not have the right tools to reverse-engineer. Only through knowledge transfer and gradual development can we reach the modern level of technology. That is why they say that if there is World War 3, they will fight with stones in World War 4. There are legends about trading, that earlier markets were much easier, and zenith traders made fortunes with the help of moving averages, now it will not be possible to do so.
It is quite unclear what is being measured here - see the highlighted comments. Allegedly much faster than rule2.
Here #32978 this function and its different implementations (equivalents), including those in C++, were measured.
Well, I have already decided on the architecture for now, I will sit on pure R-ke for now, I have found a way to speed up 25 times + there are still pluses/strong reasons not to add C++ to my code.
You can have a challenge with my AMO.
"Solve the TS."
You give me a small piece of data that you use.
You describe what operators, functions and variables you use in the code.
And you give me your eqity or signals of the algorithm.
I create a search grammar, and I pick up the code as a cipher and solve your TS.