Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 2703
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Isn't it possible to test it? Do you have to trade for half a year?
Well, so as not to be tempted to fit the history.
Well, so you're not tempted to make it fit the story.
I have no motive or temptation to cheat myself.
It's not plausible - you want to"compete", not just compare results - hence the conditions I suggested.
I am interested in comparing results, so I can test it on history. Can you think of a function to activate the model, or should I suggest it?
Not plausible - you want to"compete", not just compare results - hence the terms I suggested.
I am interested in comparing results, so I can test it on history. Can you think of a model activation function, or should I suggest it?
Model activation function?
Suggest your own variant - impulsiveness is unproductive.
Suggest your own version - impulsiveness is unproductive.
For example.
So this is in my understanding the function of model activation - a strict rule on the occurrence of which the model starts and produces a forecast.
Then maybe you should take the strategy from my article?
And in general, you can use that Expert Advisor - well, you will improve it for yourself, the binding to R, but there will be similarity in the results of the decision points.
So this is in my understanding the function of model activation - a strict rule on the occurrence of which the model starts and produces a forecast.
Then maybe we should take the strategy from my article?
And in general, you can use that Expert Advisor - well, you can refine it for yourself, linkage to R, but there will be similarity in the results of the decision points.
Can't you just post a CSV file for the training (with answers) and for the test (without answers)?
That way everyone has different predictors - that's the problem.
If it's a question of who is better at using what they have - that's a different matter.
It is necessary to start with the same understanding of terms and goals in setting tasks. At this stage of communication try not to get syncrosia, i.e. allergy to the interlocutor, and only if this stage is passed without syncrosia can we hope for results.
Zy. it is a difficult task to assemble a team of people you know, and it is even more difficult to assemble a team of people you don't know))).