Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 1662
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You've got carried away. Just high matter. Let me put it this way: man became rational when he identified his ego. Animals can hardly imagine themselves as another species, may be chempanze, but otherwise consciousness is when you can look at yourself from outside or imagine yourself otherwise. Maybe it's just a fantasy, though. But if you imagine the thought process as a transmission of electrical signals between neurons, then consciousness is nothing but a cloud of electrical discharges in a certain state. Imagine the brain, now take away the flesh and leave only the electrical signals. What do you see? A cloud of charges in a certain state. And yes, psychotropic substances were the reason for the transition to the identification of one's self.
there are animals that are conscious of their own selves, that grieve and bury their relatives.
there are animals that have much faster and more flexible memories and can understand human speech and speak themselves (as far as their speech apparatus allows).
There are animals that have more words in their vocabulary than in any human language.
The mind is very incomprehensible and difficult to measure quantitatively.
I guess we can also speculate on the subject of "consciousness and self" from the point of view of swarm intelligence. Let us take for example: a) a set of cells of one human brain, b) a set of ants of one colony, c) a set of people of one state. Obviously, in all three cases there is some consciousness inherent in the set as a whole, but consciousness of one's own self is present only in the first case. It turns out that it is a matter of the qualitative and quantitative level of connections between the elements of the set.
If you look at wikipedia, there is a clear division of concepts for Western and Eastern philosophies
That is, from whichever side you look at it will be
Right, you need to be more specific, especially in these difficult times).
I do not see (for myself) the point in raising global issues in this thread - let them be dealt with by specially trained people in specially designated places. On the contrary, I am interested in some particulars, by analogy with which you can build some computational procedures. In fact, machine learning algorithms are based on very crude models of the real world. The brain is much more complex than our neural networks, and evolution is much more complex than genetic algorithms.
The idea of describing consciousness through swarm intelligence (without going too deep) is interesting to me from the point of view of the idea of constructing TC as a portfolio of primitive systems. Simply put, you need to modify the genetic algorithm so that the target is counted by generation as a whole, rather than separately by generation organisms. A rough analogy is the evolution of a single volvox. There may be some gain in simplification of calculations, which may be useful for online recalculation of the portfolio (constantly necessary due to non-stationarity of prices). The analogy of the correlation between organisms is the correlation between primitive TS.
If you look at wikipedia, there is a clear division of concepts for Western and Eastern philosophies
i.e. from whichever side you look at it that's how it's going to be.
I want to look from practically useful side) "a tree knows by its fruits".
I read that nikolayev suggests "looking on the practically useful side" and gasped in surprise....
I want to look on the practically useful side) "The tree is known by its fruit".
I read that nikolayev suggests "looking at it from a practically useful angle" and I gasped in amazement....
Bile, apparently) I'm surprised you haven't choked on it)