Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 1391
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
All forwards, I don't even look at trader, Eurobucks, about a year
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and trading strategies testing
Machine learning in trading: theory and practice (trading and beyond)
Graal, 2019.03.03 12:45
like this now...
Approximately the same would happen on eurobucks and without MO if you were buying at the beginning of the week and selling at the end of the week during the year,
and then, like everyone else, would have safely merged, and how was it, in fact?
Every week I retrain them, then I carefully plug them in to make them work. These models go into production
In fact, this is redundant, because I will retrain them in a week anyway.)
This one is still on hold
This is for fx, for Forts is a little different, with adjustments for sessions, clearing and other stuffHalf of the topic is devoted to stories about my models, I think )) stopped writing already
I have not seen anything intelligible, or missed something. Well, no, so no.
just forgotten already.
everything I write, every sentence is meaningful.
I'm not just arguing with everyone, I'm writing from experience
above supplemented, pre-post.just forgotten already.
everything I write, every sentence is meaningful.
I'm not just arguing with everyone, I'm writing from experience.
above supplemented, pre-post.I have not read articles. I will read them.
Not only a week, but the efficiency decreases over time, which is natural
i'm testing with real ticks at the broker that i'm trading with so it's not a hope but accurate tests. although ticks are also redundant because they're not hft but to be sure how stops work, for example floating spreads, delays
I am testing with real ticks of the broker I trade with, so it is not a hope, but accurate tests.
i'm testing with real ticks of the broker i'm trading with, that's why it's not a hope but an accurate test. although ticks are also redundant because they are not hft, but to be sure how stops work, for example floating spreads, delays
For my tests 1m was always enough. Ticks do not essentially change anything in tests, the tedium is larger. In real trading the ticks fit in the system because they are needed only on the last candle and nowhere else. They go as Klose, and that's it.
Of course, more if you have your own tester, in mt5 there is no drag
One sadness now - sockets do not work in the mt5 tester. I wanted to test advanced models on python, but I can't yet.
I'm not even going to bother with DLL, because I want to put the model on a remote server and connect terminals to it remotelyOf course, more if you have your own tester, in mt5 there is no drag
One sadness now - sockets do not work in the mt5 tester. I wanted to test advanced models on python, but I can't yet.
I'm not even going to bother with DLL, because I want to write the model on a remote server and connect terminals remotely