I'm not sure why you would want that, but in my opinion, that does not make much sense, since ETH, like most cryptocurrencies are much too unstable to provide a good basis for analyzing back-testing results. The very fact that it is so volatile can heavily skew the back-test results itself, leaving you completely confused with the resulting test metrics.
I'm not sure why you would want that, but in my opinion, that does not make much sense, since ETH, like most cryptocurrencies are much too unstable to provide a good basis for analyzing back-testing results. The very fact that it is so volatile can heavily skew the back-test results itself, leaving you completely confused with the resulting test metrics.
You are making no sense! What does that have to do with the stability of back-test metrics?
Back-testing is for studying the functionality and profitability of a strategy. If you are going to set ETH as its deposit currency, the strategy will be be skewed completely, even if just testing over the last year.
As the test progresses and the tick-value is constantly deviating by large amounts and spreads being so volatile, your metrics will be skewed and useless, not permitting you to properly analyse the strategy.
You are making no sense! What does that have to do with the stability of back-test metrics?
Back-testing is for studying the functionality and profitability of a strategy. If you are going to set ETH as its deposit currency, the strategy will be be skewed completely, even if just testing over the last year.
As the test progresses and the tick-value is constantly deviating by large amounts and spreads being so volatile, your metrics will be skewed and useless, not permitting you to properly analyse the strategy.
One should trade (and test) with a deposit currency that is mostly stable, and then trade against the symbols with volatility (if you so wish), and not the other way round.
If you are going to trade with a cryptocurrency as your deposit currency, then you are going to suffer greatly with its volatility even if you don't trade at all. Imagine just how more volatile your balance value and trading will be with the increased uncertainty and volatility of using such an unstable deposit currency. That is utter madness and completely foolhardy!
One should trade (and test) with a deposit currency that is mostly stable, and then trade against the symbols with volatility (if you so wish), and not the other way round.
If you are going to trade with a cryptocurrency as your deposit currency, then you are going to suffer greatly with its volatility even if you don't trade at all. Imagine just how more volatile your balance value and trading will be with the increased uncertainty and volatility of using such an unstable deposit currency. That is utter madness and completely foolhardy!
Even the instability which you believe will happen, will be NOTHING compared to that of cryptos. Even GBP that suffered during Brexit did not suffer enough to make it unstable. You preach fundamentals, but seem to understand it very little!
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use