Is this test reliable? - page 2

 
Nelson Wanyama:

Why not run it in a demo account for a couple of days then make a decision after that period?

David Diez:

A couple of days means nothing.

Then run it for 3 months.

Or 6 months.

 
Keith Watford:

Then run it for 3 months.

Or 6 months.

I think I'm going live.

 
David Diez:

I think I'm going live.

I hope you will come and tell us of the results.

 
I already know the outcome.
 
David Diez:

A couple of days means nothing.

A day means so much to me, personally. 

I could test that  EA inside out, check all parameters, try different symbols, plug in some weird inputs to see how it handles them. etc etc. 

I wouldn't waste my money buying a bot then waste it on a 3 month demo. A day is enough for me.

 
Marco vd Heijden:
I already know the outcome.

Tell me please.

 

I already did.

 
Nelson Wanyama:

A day means so much to me, personally. 

I could test that  EA inside out, check all parameters, try different symbols, plug in some weird inputs to see how it handles them. etc etc. 

I wouldn't waste my money buying a bot then waste it on a 3 month demo. A day is enough for me.

For that reason I'm going live tomorrow.

 
Marco vd Heijden:
I already know the outcome.

Just said the EA is fine tuned to the tick generating algorithm, but it's not giving results on all pairs.

May I supose the results are manipulated?
 
David Diez:

Just said the EA is fine tuned to the tick generating algorithm, but it's not giving results on all pairs.

May I supose the results are manipulated?

We don't know the author personally. The only way to find out is to try and see if the EA does what he says it does.