My opinion this is not coding....
full of errors
I thought MetaQuotes did proofreading before publishing
if ()&&open1>MA)
This is something you can see directly wrong coded
If MetaQuotes publish this kind of writing then my opinion is STOP DIRECTLY with it
MQL4 striped out this part when uploading the code with out mentioning any reason. The code is far too simple to be IP (in this newbie's uninformed opinion) and the conditions are original (if there is such a thing), but correct the EA at your own risk. If any moderator has an issue with this section please take it down, I am not trying to violate any rules or steal anyone's work.
The Missing Code:
// Definition of patterns from FXWORDS.COM (not advertising)
// strong Indicator
bool abandoned_baby=((open3>close3)&&(open2>close2)&&(low2<low3)&&(open1<close1)&&(low1>=low2)&&(close1>open3));
bool morning_doji_star=((open3>close3)&&((open2-close2)<=0)&&(open1<close3)&&(close1<open3));
bool three_inside_up=((open3>close3)&&(MathAbs(close2-open2))<=0.6*MathAbs(open3-close3)&&(close2>open2)&&(close1>open1)&&(close1>open3));
bool three_outside_up=((open3>close3)&&(1.1*MathAbs(open3-close3)<MathAbs(open2-close2))&&(open2<close2)&&(open1<close1));
bool three_white_soldiers=((open3<close3)&&(open2<close2)&&(open1<close1)&&(close3<close2<close1));
//----
// Weak
bool hammer=((MathAbs(low1-MathMin(open1,close1))>=2*(MathAbs(open1-close1)))&&((MathAbs(high1-MathMax(open1,close1)))<=0.2*(MathAbs(close1-open1))));
// set up algo
if ((abandoned_baby==true||morning_doji_star==true||three_inside_up==true||three_outside_up==true||three_white_soldiers==true)&&open1<MA)
{
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use
Bullish Reversal:
Author: Adrian Robles