PIPPRO trend-pro professional profitable trending system - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
So what's the point to ask for "no more than $100" on this topic ? I don't understand you.
No point , a lot of coders work for $30 for an EA. This is for cheap amateur EAS.
We can discuss about professional quality EAS for live accounts in a different thread, about the difference between professional level and amateur level
That depends on the coder and not on the price.
You can have a $30 job that easily outperforms a $100 or even $600 job.
The idea that the quality is better when you pay more, is a fallacy.
That depends on the coder and not on the price.
You can have a $30 job that easily outperforms a $100 or even $600 job.
The idea that the quality is better when you pay more, is a fallacy.
i know a coder on this site, he is a quality coder, he would do it for $30.So I agree with you.Paying for indicators also has same logic. as paying for free strategies.You don't have to pay for an EA , if a coder wants this EA for himself and is willing to share it for free. he would get help on coding instructions and you guys get a free profitable EA.
iF i give you guys 3 more profitable strategies, you don't have to work ever, you get a paycheck every month, if all 4 profitable coded for free. Now that is the benefit of being on this site.
Here is same set up profitable on gbp/usd making +500 pips
There is free lunch on this site, but as a member you have to give to community, the community gives you.
Thank you community for free great indicators
watch out for my proof of a profitable strategy, new ea is showing profits
You really should not be promising things that you can not make truth in reality.
Coders usually code because they like what they do not necessarily because they have to or for 'work'.
Seeing you using that term makes me think that you are in the wrong field.
They also usually know on forehand if the offered strategy will perform or not.
And seeing you using indicator i would simply reject the job right away.You really should not be promising things that you can not make truth in reality.
Coders usually code because they like what they do not necessarily because they have to or for 'work'.
Seeing you using that term makes me think that you are in the wrong field.
They also usually know on forehand if the offered strategy will perform or not.
And seeing you using indicator i would simply reject the job right away.How can coders know if a strategy is great , by looking at indicators, they don't trade trade they code and look at codes.It is like a Belgian taking about french onions, when he does not eat any.Only a frenchman would know what great onions are like.
And seeing you using indicator i would simply reject the job right away.
you admitted it was a billionaire strategy , so maybe you don't want anyone else to know , so you can sell it in the market place.It serves the the forums right ,if they were hiding the profitable strategies, so everybody remains here to pay mod's wages.Then you have to ban profitable members,like all forums do, so the forum owners can get rich.
There back test
Because coders have been there before.
I was waiting for the all promising back test graph.
It's like clockwork.How can coders know if a strategy is great , by looking at indicators, they don't trade trade they code and look at codes.It is like a Belgian taking about french onions, when he does not eat any.Only a frenchman would know what great onions are like.
And seeing you using indicator i would simply reject the job right away.
you admitted it was a billionaire strategy , so maybe you don't want anyone else to know , so you can sell it in the market place.It serves the the forums right ,if they were hiding the profitable strategies, so everybody remains here to pay mod's wages.Then you have to ban profitable members,like all forums do, so the forum owners can get rich.
There back test
Many Programmer have already read everything in this thread, already first thing they saw is your "Stepma ..." give already false entry, secondly there is a huge drawdown on that back-test graph which you have share. The most moderate developer will ask you $30.00 to $35.00 per indicator which need to be included within your EA.
That EA can't be profitable in the long run, it will need your attention as it trade.
Many Programmer have already read everything in this thread, already first thing they saw is your "Stepma ..." give already false entry, secondly there is a huge drawdown on that back-test graph which you have share. The most moderate developer will ask you $30.00 to $35.00 per indicator which need to be included within your EA.
That EA can't be profitable in the long run, it will need your attention as it trade.
talk about the blind leading the blind or teaching a grand mother how to suck eggs.
No pain no gain.NO RISK NO REWARD.
No such thing as a perfect EA
Because coders have been there before.
I was waiting for the all promising back test graph.
It's like clockwork.the only thing like clockworks every profitable system get knocked , all the garbage indicators get bumped with all the failed systems from the old forex-tsd, so everybody remains and keeps buying from the market place, so site owner s rich.