You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Upgraded double macd + rsi EA (made new metatrader 4 compatible) : doublemacdrsi_nmc.mq4
LADEN,
thanks for updating nmc ver,can you be more kind to tell,which exact indicators (macd and rsi) should be used with this EA,thanks.
regards
LADEN,
thanks for updating nmc ver,can you be more kind to tell,which exact indicators (macd and rsi) should be used with this EA,thanks.
regardsmntiwana
No use to any external indicator. It is using the metatrader built in indicators
mntiwana
No use to any external indicator. It is using the metatrader built in indicatorsDearest MLADEN,
thanks for early response,so we can not use any of external new/latest macd and rsi indicators alternatively with out some changes in EA code ?
regards
Dearest MLADEN,
thanks for early response,so we can not use any of external new/latest macd and rsi indicators alternatively with out some changes in EA code ?
regardsmntiwana
We can change it to use some other, but there is no need for that.
mntiwana
We can change it to use some other, but there is no need for that.Dearest MLADEN,
thanks for reply,actually my question is,if we can apply some other new,latest and upgraded versions of macd and rsi indicators with out changing code inside EA.......or we must needs some changes in code too.for example lagurre or advanced step rsi floating level--same with other kind of macd ?
regards
Dearest MLADEN,
thanks for reply,actually my question is,if we can apply some other new,latest and upgraded versions of macd and rsi indicators with out changing code inside EA.......or we must needs some changes in code too.for example lagurre or advanced step rsi floating level--same with other kind of macd ?
regardsmntiwana
Will check what can be done
mntiwana
Will check what can be doneDearest MLADEN,
much thanks for taking in consideration,
regards
Dearest MLADEN,
much thanks for taking in consideration,
regardsForgot this thread
Anyway, it occurred to me that rsx would probably be a better choice, so that is going to be the first "experiment"
Forgot this thread
Anyway, it occurred to me that rsx would probably be a better choice, so that is going to be the first "experiment"
Dearest MLADEN,
Thanks for keeping live this pretty thread,since after a period of six years you tease it..........yes of course your suggession for rsx is more value able and effective,so let us first try at rsx,looks what came out,thanks
regards
Macd of averages could be a hood choice to use instead of built in macd