You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Ray
You already have a "trend" buffer in the original RK-PrCh_Signal-1 indicator. You do not need to call a mtf version to access trend buffer from an EA. All you have to do is to call the original indicator with desired time frame and with 6 in the place of buffer number
regards
Mladen
Mladen
Thank you for the MTF, if I could indulge one more item "could you put the trend in the new indicator" for the EA to read?
Thanks again
RayHere is this one
It is a non lag zig zag based indicator (it needs the non lag indicator attached at this post too to work properly). But be careful since it is going to be rather heavy on your PC (more or less it is not what we can make when a multiple number of indicators are concerned, but what our metatrader can take : this indicator, when using default settings, is loading 63 instances of non lag zig zag and that can be a burden for metatrader. Same would be (even worse) if one would use zig zag or 3 level zizg zag since zig zag always calculates all the bars - imagine 63 indicators (or 189 in case of 3 level zig zag) calculating all the bars on a new tick)
PS: in this indicator if the current peak is up, then it assumes that the trend is down and opposite. See the example picture above with the current state of non lag zig zag and how it shows on dashboard
regards
MladenMladen,
"if the current peak is up, then it assumes that the trend is down and opposite"...May I suggest an alternative?I would like to suggest that,probably,higher highs and higher lows,vs Lower highs and lower lows,may lead to interesting comparisons,in order to do so,I believe that using "if the current peak is up+lower than previous zz high...then the trend is down,and viceversa",may lead to better results.
Simba
In that case all the needs to be done is to change (invert) the colors for up and down (from the parameters). That way it can work either way without over complicating the list of parameters with some additional options. What I wanted to do is to make clear how the indicator works in order to avoid any confusion, coloring is regulated through parameters so, it is actually up to a user how does she/he want it to be
regards
Mladen
Mladen, "if the current peak is up, then it assumes that the trend is down and opposite"...May I suggest an alternative?I would like to suggest that,probably,higher highs and higher lows,vs Lower highs and lower lows,may lead to interesting comparisons,in order to do so,I believe that using "if the current peak is up+lower than previous zz high...then the trend is down,and viceversa",may lead to better results.
Request
Hi Mladen,
Thanks for the dashboard.
I think I know what Simba is asking for and I was going to make a similar request. If the non-lag zigzag makes a higher high and higher low (4 separate points) the dashboard should show an uptrend for that timeframe; if it makes a lower low and lower high it should show a downtrend. If it makes, for example, a higher low and and a lower high it should show no trend. So, in the example chart that you posted the dashboard colour is indeed correct, as it has lower highs and lows, but I think our logic is slightly different.
With regards to the processing time, would it be possibel to have the option to only display for the current pair?
Regards.
Thank you
stav01
The non lag ziz zag does not have the info that we had we regular price bars (it is a "single value" indicator unlike the price bar for which we can get 4 different values regarding price alone + volume + time), hence we can not do the same comparison stuff we did on price bars in the original version of high low dashboard (even that single value is a "discontinued" value since only peaks actually have values while the rest of the line is drawn by metatrader in that indicator - it can easily be checked even in the data window where it will not show ant values for a line between the peaks)
As of current pair : made a change of the indicator. If "Symbols" parameter is empty, then the indicator is going to use current symbol (so it will work the way you need it - that is the case of the example picture above - it has empty symbols field and the current time frame non lag zig zag attached to it separately)
regards
MladenThank you for your work and your explanations.
TDI-RSX Smoothed and Alerts+lines
spotforex
I like the idea :):)
____________________
And in order to cover all bases, here it is in 2 flavors : the regular smoothed (built in metatrader moving average used for internal smoothing that is done in indicator calculation) and a Jurik smoothed used instead.
Here is the comparison of the 3 : upper is rsx based jurik smoothed, middle is rsx based regular smoothed and the lower is the original TDI itself. As expected, the jurik smoothed is probably the fastest (taking into account that some false alerts are eliminated with the rsx versions), but let us test it more thoroughly PS: since rsx is already smoothed, RsxPriceLinePeriod parameter can be set to 1 (one) in both versions to get minimal lagregards
MladenMladen
Is it possible to add bullish and bearish divergence lines to the attached indicator that I beleive that you wrote?
Many thankstdi_rsx_based_-_smoothed_amp_alertslines2.mq4
Pearson coefficient with probable error bands ...
This is a Pearson coefficient with probable error bands indicator ...
Here are 2 examples of EURUSD to USDCHF correlation both with CorrLag set to 0 (so "USDCHF" has to be entered in CorrSymbol field)
Relative Vigor Index _ Divergence
Hi Mladen
Relative Vigor Index
Divergence
???
pakeha
Here you go Works in mtf too, so it is covered in all cases now (here is an example of mtf divergence)
regards
Mladen
Mladen
Is it possible to add bullish and bearish divergence lines to the attached indicator that I beleive that you wrote?
Many thankstdi_rsx_based_-_smoothed_amp_alertslines2.mq4TDI-RSX Smoothed and Alerts+lines
pakeha
Here you go
Works in mtf too, so it is covered in all cases now (here is an example of mtf divergence)
regards
MladenThank you so much. The value you provide is immense.